X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:message-id:from:to:subject
	:content-type:date; q=dns; s=default; b=kczOrGNt16RhROi9Fy2avnuq
	eZ1QgqxrJ29bQ3clulxPuHWDR4btiVzRzBGggby8Tie2O0k9sMi7luIl69HfkFC+
	PPa2iyLhuqK4DVZhIdJo6aRJkQuWIfR9ndG5ENn4ngHwLZfrrf0D/2QfHl42IBm7
	SmQOjNnhwVuEbg3j4Z4=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:message-id:from:to:subject
	:content-type:date; s=default; bh=LOcnGUefzwvgY21WhAsq92hnuJg=; b=
	FptUHc76RytRtb9k5xnH+znRxhQNkUA0ZTomM7QzADqVketpYVk5kQirzlCNS5yz
	3+B7fOuFvK1eaV0tj/+Q1qr4ItjPaZw0wvWuVdggarAQWqFehufn3Gs/ZvfkTR9F
	63jGzyT/M5F1YmW17lX/EF5sN/BvZovzCkZ9UKBZyDg=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:app, H*MI:app, programming, HImportance:normal
X-HELO:	mout.gmx.net
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<trinity-f45c45ea-b5bd-4792-bcbb-3da58e7a2fb4-1525362137834@3c-app-gmx-bs61>
From:	"Ory Chowaw-Liebman" <Ory DOT Chowaw-Liebman AT gmx DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	LLVM JIT based project fails due to undefined HAVE_DLOPEN
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2018 17:42:17 +0200
Sensitivity:	Normal
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V01:K0:MmIqFloNwUI=:iIqDycLttisYG9Y/RNtZlu yPH/tJ7jcDD4jE1+0TQaQvCY+R6EADg9A0noRjDM1ai3eQkegwOEAzxzoGziuvlhthuASrxJL 7//z+9hAHN8kJ6mKcBhyRImujYRz8y90SJ4zYhNfnC9EOKoGJ14LovxmN/MTmE5F4EskCgtHG 5XD9nvijQIbmv+Lw46dO8cD3iatZP5Ply0lCl/L6ItuI3DF15xW++2hnOWTHASgtO8honzv1I rADNwtbHUO41okGLgP6M9SGs3YYPqzi9eVCJcHCeig86wrp1pqWzvwYUtH/kQr4FKTjVnpXsq kwYKp1mGnRKij4MmxM9iB4eV9wJDvgo6Kq4NRIxLLjEdZ/b6dAnXHDidzR3bW4uqC3HnJXMFX itA9PorrvIXIGPcK1CUctvjqshxlSaBbZhJF3BMNNL9hePVIC1dCqA9kFJh2NxkwkAW4UmJm2 qffGgVHvrTB8nVs316QtPb6lOjdo1H0T6x/XgsNGrd51fS1imJCL

Dear All,

during my work on a programming language I noticed that with the update to LLVM 5.0.1
the LLVM calls fail to find symbols defined in my executable.
It used to work before the upgrade, and still works fine under windows.
objdump lists the symbols wanted.

With a lot of tracing through the LLVM code, I found that it depends
on HAVE_DLOPEN being defined in a POSIX environment. When
I call GCC with "-E -dM" only 
_GLIBCXX_HAVE_DLFCN_H
is defined.

Just using dlopen and friends from my code works fine (though there are o man pages).
Should the macros HAVE_DLOPEN and HAVE_DLFCN_H not be defined?

Thanks and best regards,
Ory

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -