X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:reply-to:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=tzQg5QGiWAf/PZNm
	ZSRTpTGC1BoBHSLsbX1791sHOUDsv8Xh7L91mlh3cNpTIkZM+sT9YTcRjXBq22CS
	PNwi8t30PaPVejscIoRyYBSfjt5C8Ps1iQEQSYpcdeZvGLNTLXExz/dot8jacjT1
	nA95pJHYpD0ANCFuwnSas7hvG7s=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:reply-to:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=PB99c6yOlGU8snLgGpd2Jt
	ukhlM=; b=AYjbhZLgoABDmCy5SM5bNeaHDbzC1wvMNj6p6AO/NK00ZtYUUluQ4G
	YtxTVHoJaT6gYgHxQBB3ZJ6pF8fUmeXgVlYTAOB3Dm+2I22syZpCYKaLQLgYPgEV
	gjXFWibYHF5mRFP5Tn0p90Qu9RGo/ki/+dg1qeu5xysINOOvc+igg=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Prof, downloaded, HX-Received:10.99.113.78, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit
X-HELO:	mail-pf0-f169.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=17IuWci+b/b9rDkquWIIZcjIV1TUxxpW/w7U3NPSVxo=; b=FrJ5hIKsuSdi3gfBMsCSWuJVySjSvABcCvEDa+V0/RovC4DsEkb3NIRhjsRXVUapjS ZzwHZHiAeY/Gvj+O9uIL0lgCAj3xYQb4RDVvBSi4Gr3/pOaqQfe9iqp/9ibns/N/73ZJ RDaod+FJhSAC/fhvlqMaYj2wu6ENfCZvpMOdyKf5BHy/8yeuEH68bLayTodcJ6l4MKNs iYKV2fzVv00Tl80eiLaUIJeoCNtYo7hEMk2SXzSoGTqTepc2pRNOlaLgPV8zhX0KQe4b NEXPvWt2nlb8CRdwx1EAlZyCnbzwMWowoQb5IyacOE3Qk0nUt7xB/gKZwxM4FlgymIPC mmOA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALQs6tAFaWnPnRCY+D5nxPL64LKukuzE0jdPTCQhorlxF0hWh7E8DGDS AlDA6DYTqJxYbgVb1mRgwDmpOUOAwhfjg70KSbJXUjf0miL/OJ3zFPlV/7kL1/mkR9n+1UQht9v 2Z4PcN2YZ4xtC/B3nKzDmhgaP0do11KV4IHhBjHKQPr6EQpMZyWKlRWyONr+e3qDSPGdcGw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AIpwx4+e+cicCAyyG4BDZoCigyKG9TCTubdPxu4A8Qf0eEE2M9lkZtwGk6CdKn2XjH3TCOpB8lW25A==
X-Received:	by 10.99.113.78 with SMTP id b14mr14358608pgn.76.1523919092343; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: X Server 1.19.6-2 , xset does not add ghostscript fonts for xfig
To:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<66756897-e6cf-9d20-dec5-de9e634defa4 AT monash DOT edu> <ea575a6b-50c7-3d3b-c48a-a0b618be33b6 AT cornell DOT edu> <4e10fb29-6905-2214-67f3-bf35f3021337 AT cornell DOT edu> <87d0zyipi7 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <3160976e-19a9-4ac1-02fa-d511185240a7 AT cornell DOT edu> <87muz081l6 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <d58371cb-6d59-1a14-178b-6f26c5b7fce7 AT cornell DOT edu>
From:	"Andrew P Paplinski via cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Andrew P Paplinski <andrew DOT paplinski AT monash DOT edu>
Message-ID:	<4bece0bb-b415-8d10-06a1-8d4baf2bc911@monash.edu>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:51:28 +1000
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<d58371cb-6d59-1a14-178b-6f26c5b7fce7@cornell.edu>

On 17/04/2018 6:45 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 3/22/2018 1:25 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Ken Brown writes:
>>> What a mess!
>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>>> There's a comment just yesterday at
>>>
>>>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551219#c8
>>>
>>> suggesting that there will be some Fedora changes in the urw font
>>> package coming this week.  So let's wait for the dust to settle, and
>>> then I hope we can just copy whatever solution Fedora comes up with.
>>
>> That works for me.  :-)
>
> Following Fedora 
> (https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/urw-base35-fonts.git/commit/?id=f18d6d5b26d2eae4d7730b0b1137b4b54909d9fa), 
> I've created and uploaded a new subpackage urw-base35-fonts-legacy 
> that contains old versions of the fonts.  These should work with xfig.
>
> The fonts are in /usr/share/X11/fonts/urw-fonts, with a symlink in 
> /etc/X11/fontpath.d/.
>
> I did some limited testing, and xfig seems to find the fonts.  (I 
> didn't call xset or do anything else special.)
>
> Achim, if I'm right, you don't have to do anything with xfig except to 
> add a dependency on urw-base35-fonts-legacy.
>
> But someone more familiar with xfig than I am should test this.
>
> Ken

Thanks, Ken

Magic, magic and xfig works.
I have downloaded the urw-base35-fonts-legacy  (and urw-base35-fonts)  
fonts.
They are, as you said, in
/usr/share/X11/fonts/urw-fonts, with a symlink in /etc/X11/fontpath.d/
and the xfig picked them up automatically.

Thanks, again.

Andrew

-- 
A/Prof. Andrew P Paplinski
http://users.monash.edu/~app


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -