X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=FxuHr6cpPsf9QiiihPfSjKirgcg8up2jMPJ8/cW2Sbu
	kQllt3bWR88d767/b9NSQdANc46X9l48/n/xQyqeID+IhD1HIUZi9Ig5yxPAJol4
	0QP508EoZaU1thYQ/uu9wju+0Sm32RE7PqpTMi6SHDlh9nrYh5T1z789ZHI7oCy0
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=bi/6gRlMyKFBl8uwe27Hs1eZsAk=; b=hz7irfS6j6lnWf0B9
	1Xp+GEdPx+L28ERJw6ni8Tx3/HCvz9rLEqkvZJKWCAUJ8KquW6MhbzoMXaGoJxwH
	gmMZHY/Oy6pHIlX0H5rztYMG4UVhPCwwzBELGizxmpsDkYf4wB1Dk8ohXb+hkCGc
	pp7PnDNfyYQQpk58omwHhj7Cs0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=sftp, 2100, transfer
X-HELO:	Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org
Message-ID:	<5ACAA0E6.5040504@tlinx.org>
Date:	Sun, 08 Apr 2018 16:08:22 -0700
From:	L A Walsh <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Network Performance?
References:	<a45d39ab-93e1-41d5-22c7-40a61e355fd5 AT gmail DOT com> <5AB5825C DOT 8060309 AT tlinx DOT org> <5AB6E770 DOT 8020603 AT tlinx DOT org> <8794ec10-dcee-4ad6-bfe6-3c8c108ca5f6 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<8794ec10-dcee-4ad6-bfe6-3c8c108ca5f6@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Would you be able to test file performance over the 
> network? If you could just try copying a ~1GB file or what have you via 
> sftp or rsync with actual writes to disk, I would be very interested to 
> see how the numbers change.
---
	Here is scp and rsync, using a tar, and a 1g file filled
with zeros.   Note, my env RSYNC_RSH=ssh

> time scp default-nlaw.tar.7z ishtar:/tmp  
default-nlaw.tar.7z                           100%   62MB  83.1MB/s   00:00    
0.91sec 0.04usr 0.01sys (6.65% cpu)
> ssh ishtar rm /tmp/default-nlaw.tar.7z
> time rsync -v default-nlaw.tar.7z ishtar:/tmp/
default-nlaw.tar.7z
sent 64,588,267 bytes  received 35 bytes  43,058,868.00 bytes/sec
total size is 64,572,413  speedup is 1.00
0.73sec 0.37usr 0.17sys (74.32% cpu)
time scp /tmp/1g ishtar:/tmp/ 
1g                                            100% 1014MB  72.3MB/s   00:14    
15.00sec 0.04usr 0.07sys (0.81% cpu)
> time rsync -v /tmp/1g ishtar:/tmp/
1g
sent 1,063,515,721 bytes  received 35 bytes  125,119,500.71 bytes/sec
total size is 1,063,256,064  speedup is 1.00
7.57sec 5.95usr 3.40sys (123.54% cpu)

> uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1 Athenae 2.10.0(0.325/5/3) 2018-02-02 15:16 x86_64 Cygwin


I generally don't use them to transfer files over a closed
subnet as the performance is sub-optimal.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -