X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Ca9SCsPv6QR+P0+e
	4jU/ctTNFlZ55wgfaB9HVlW+/DHX//2fziziN+hBVxuu1s08EmBiIkFyFKP8L6Jw
	K27OYmCJjqXMsX3U4LfOGGCeJpRwx0VZPU3/Zhnv7BdN64YSaVC997lzSiS+4/Q0
	CvjT9Ak/iavXNM/rl05lmWniUEs=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=2DoKl3UH8QGnWXoCcSdJXb
	W1wZc=; b=bgnOSmkwXfx49nZ1Nl9wz98fNdWhhgytBZkXgs0UTzNIBqkn9yRMhP
	FTFuL8IGte8JtMARerdSp8fZ8rD7+5AvNOG0eINbjTc3S6FDAtLg3dFJWErAeMOa
	sVvdj4HlEFzJ+ochrBAvG89wq+Fn7GyN9mFuXb6ZI5d1Eo/DbIEsE=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_THEBAT,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:D*yandex.ru, yandexru, acl, UD:yandex.ru
X-HELO:	forward100p.mail.yandex.net
Authentication-Results:	smtp2p.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2018 19:14:04 +0300
From:	Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<944079553.20180328191404@yandex.ru>
To:	Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Filemode change by windows applications
In-Reply-To:	<7f3fe599-eda0-2c97-b344-687b606615eb@cs.umass.edu>
References:	<CAFeO1eoW52-4S4gD0=YL7g1YKsjjn9Jk8twV22e57HmmKQc5vg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <518060803 DOT 20180328171118 AT yandex DOT ru> <9965f4cf-566c-6d20-61b7-ce43580935aa AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <7f3fe599-eda0-2c97-b344-687b606615eb AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id w2SGKRHK018816

Greetings, Eliot Moss!

> On 3/28/2018 10:40 AM, Eliot Moss wrote:
>> On 3/28/2018 10:11 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> 
>>>> and is there anything I can do to prevent windows
>>>> applications from setting the execute bit on my files?
>>>
>>> No, and you will be unable to use Windows associations, if you clear execute bit
>>> on documents.
>> 
>> Interesting that you think so, Andrey.  I just tested this on my Windows 10
>> Surface Book.  I used Windows Explorer to navigate to a folder where I had
>> cleared the x bits from a .docx file (setting mode to 660 with chmod in
>> Cygwin), and clicking on the file opened Word on the file just fine.  Maybe
>> this behavior is dependent on some other things as well?

> Here is getfacl output for the file in question:

> # file: Progress Letters S16.docx
> # owner: moss
> # group: moss
> user::rw-
> group::---
> group:SYSTEM:r-x                        #effective:r--
> group:Cygwin:rwx                        #effective:rw-
> mask:rw-
> other:---

If you ANSOLUTELY remove execute bit (this is often happens on samba shares
managed by POSIX ACL for example, when you create file with POSIX tools before
Samba have a say about permissions), things break hard.

> So there are underlying x bits of some kind, but Cygwin does display
> mode 660 via ls -l (for example).

> Still, we entirely agree that there is not really a way to prevent a
> Windows program from setting the x bits.  Here is getfacl from another
> file in the same folder, reflecting how Word sets the permissions:

> # file: Progress Letters S17.docx
> # owner: moss
> # group: moss
> # flags: -s-
> user::rwx
> group::---
> group:SYSTEM:r-x
> group:Cygwin:rwx
> mask:rwx
> other:r-x

> I think the key difference is "mask".

Cygwin way of treating Windows ACL's is still kind of mystery to me.
I know they works… somehow. But I prefer to stay away from them, where
possible. I need interoperability over "zealous POSIX compatibility".


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Wednesday, March 28, 2018 19:10:43

Sorry for my terrible english...
--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -