X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=D3z6tJkc70Qf/hFbWu1cVI9PIF2y8gjD2TLpFDGYm2d
	aQrm6b+V+fA40IPO3KXjA5oFAdiGOftTHAT81BgXciq/Ggys2uskuF6LN8VhIrBt
	OxBq4q41NF1+yMBEwlZhT5lacpIKgeasrioslK1upe/uYawvMXetvUW7xGhqIl1o
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=i1w2HEb7jMvMHbJeuecgn6dVLXA=; b=eBRRdtzTyQyq0J+iJ
	6FkA234UmT/md23TZ9cMdl3nyV0p2Dh6XBp7Y7g/shQqFOTl6GtQDaqP+yernl9J
	ZBUiK3NfL+U1KmbCtQEfVp32rTMPsagmYf12UF78QI8kToJMWS3nZLItLCXDi4KI
	sQGSs30zsjf+HB3HKXU2WMmmhM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=D*ru, HX-Received:10.98.30.66, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit
X-HELO:	mail-pf0-f174.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=67gSNJjzQQafhFASysPtfBpFtJgtrg5hqSyUPiez7Tk=; b=FWhaIJAQAvzvxXSmsiVrg3XPHDWe/UKBtrUPd2IjwCfZ+ZDvuPTKv677RLNUroXhc/ Tij4wzBYhj28T/Ck4XTuAHTdOq1+m6hrrTujELvqTvs/WoqAW2HqUpaUj8DPVpE2T0Nw QjxTZIGAwK+Bvj3aNtxp4qAwBll3DTuo8cNYHmQYQtPJNEqzmabWzNPuMjp3Rt4OETi8 r4T8KZdW6B8DBQ71wEOlmFEO/eXEFYFRa8KtlfTy/ClEUt2+BvpP0M5HpsJrJJoc1sES /ct87+SiY8qix5j7w5DCR8mqYGNdoX5Nq0F9CY6IRP18aiw+nFOPfbLKSpO65wixbeff OCrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AElRT7EIkWqIetEkPyvZ98wlEh15xHpi4hqUJWSs06Yh7pXVaeDoRi4u nMMR4R4Fq3MN7n59pKVb8+GTcw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AG47ELvGbjLEoPgEjWrVBuwE+kYfDqPy41r/aR/1MfpexQD96dITlmrqx7hoZUFLPeXDygrMr+aJlA==
X-Received:	by 10.98.30.66 with SMTP id e63mr4653717pfe.67.1521288717407; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 05:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sat, 17 Mar 2018 21:11:55 +0900
From:	Lemures Lemniscati <lemures DOT lemniscati AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: pngcheck warning: Compiled with zlib 1.2.8; using zlib 1.2.11.
In-Reply-To:	<667159508.20180317141601@yandex.ru>
References:	<20180317173329 DOT D2AC DOT 50F79699 AT gmail DOT com> <667159508 DOT 20180317141601 AT yandex DOT ru>
Message-Id:	<20180317211151.8E6E.50F79699@gmail.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Thank you, Marco and Andrey.

I'm relieved and I've decided not to care the info.


But, I've dropped another example. Just reporting it:

$ pngcheck a.png b.png > ab.log; echo ----; cat ab.log; echo ----
----
zlib warning:  different version (expected 1.2.8, using 1.2.11)

OK: a.png (1000x1000, 16-bit grayscale+alpha, non-interlaced, 96.1%).
OK: b.png (1000x1000, 16-bit grayscale+alpha, non-interlaced, 97.0%).

No errors were detected in 2 of the 2 files tested.
----

Regards,
--
Lem


==
Subject: Re: pngcheck warning: Compiled with zlib 1.2.8; using zlib 1.2.11.
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:16:01 +0300
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>

> Greetings, Lemures Lemniscati!
> 
> > Hi, 
> 
> > pngcheck warns like this, though it seems not to be harmful.
> 
> > $ pngcheck
> > PNGcheck, version 2.3.0 of 7 July 2007,
> >    by Alexander Lehmann, Andreas Dilger and Greg Roelofs.
> >    Compiled with zlib 1.2.8; using zlib 1.2.11.
> > ...
> 
> That's not a warning, just an information. If ABI is not changed, things just
> keep working.
> 
> > $ cygcheck -c pngcheck zlib
> > Cygwin Package Information
> > Package              Version        Status
> > pngcheck             2.3.0-1        OK
> > zlib                 1.2.11-1       OK
> 
> 
> -- 
> With best regards,
> Andrey Repin
> Saturday, March 17, 2018 14:15:18
> 
> Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -