X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=XCowNBy3Ot2ku2gp
	Xxvzo3XLacgDj0jUKaLt1qVoNVHC5i7WNPNKKzhtizpkUPbS+m4M5UGdAX3gDbgT
	0J9i/M+9C0qJiYYn+6cYWz/BQLOzCDKzlahT0oPz8F79sVdw4O76uV+Vt/n1J4p9
	LvcSch+KCZAkR9UXXMwj6DoWl4A=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=wY2dg8ObdU6/p05OREsc/j
	3U56w=; b=ZeVws1yRnWO1+VItF0M5k0XFpBBA5xHXE7aEGY/0HB2RlsdsHX/JPU
	j1K+zHjzJ9puRt7kbtrIETG02uiVvbBuPTRnPetPbtl+jSblw7+xBoVaG+QT4VqU
	sq5ZxRh5RWGND+Ezz6LROrW/DfARssHyjv8fyqqvbfmv1yBbEiSAE=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=claims, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit
X-HELO:	smtp-out-no.shaw.ca
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.3 cv=X6B81lbe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=rgBQ4hhxdAUbospp6FkA:9 a=lTAOM7zWRXSSMKw8:21 a=w_uieKu4bV5hZQOr:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Reply-To:	Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca
Subject:	Re: [bug] coreutils: potentially dangerous: $(realpath //) != /
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20180312232815 DOT 692b5da79fc18abf86d42ba1 AT inbox DOT ru> <20180313023854 DOT 2e07e4396f934961935e4435 AT inbox DOT ru> <0277f5b4-35e4-4da0-2bea-b73c4fdcfa89 AT redhat DOT com> <20180314135845 DOT caeb571cdd5a54fc5b3fd4aa AT inbox DOT ru> <5a588f7d-8f9d-4126-4467-1626304cd89f AT towo DOT net>
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Message-ID:	<48847961-6d22-77ae-14a5-61a5386496da@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date:	Sat, 17 Mar 2018 00:15:58 -0600
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5a588f7d-8f9d-4126-4467-1626304cd89f@towo.net>
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4wfMRAZDJT76GxbZUQGOahewWG3shgyb5/vm30rOPJazFpi61dZ5b6yWlz8R/dyTPE4LItyjMjZHYy0uL8iWNA5P3YpWUrewI0UtoqKdxS1fNM+EgQexT7 0Xs9K00u1MRBJUTimsRpF/VUUbfdMEgLoArOa91jObYs/uw2dNgVLXwHYqpq0S3HvCodJ9y5Ibvdgg==
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2018-03-15 01:11, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 14.03.2018 um 11:58 schrieb Mikhail Usenko via cygwin:
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:43:13 -0500
>> Eric Blake <...> wrote:
>>> Just because Linux has taken the stance that their documented definition
>>> of // is "synonym for /" does NOT mean that ALL POSIX systems have taken
>>> the same approach; Cygwin has taken the approach that "// is documented
>>> to be the root of network access points, distinct from /".
>>>
>>> POSIX allows leeway between implementations; this is one of those
>>> documented places where they differ, yet are still both POSIX compliant
>>> with their different choices.  If your script is not robust to what
>>> POSIX has already warned you about, fix your script.

>> If you really claims that Cygwin may and should be different and distinct
>> from all other existing POSIX systems (the more so that it is allowed by
>> POSIX),
> which is not the case. There are other systems where // is the network root.
>> then it would probably be more obvious and clear to say this at the very 
>> beginning, e.g. "Get that Linux feeling (with all those differences and
>> distinctions) - on Windows"
> Considering that due to the limitations of being embedded in Windows, Cygwin
> cannot always perfectly mimic either Linux or POSIX systems, I personally prefer
> the more generic approach to define POSIX as its model.

It's comforting to know that if a script arg is supplied as / and used as the
target of rmdir $v/ or rm -rf $v/..., it won't do anything.
(Although any such args should always be canonicalized, then checked to ensure
they are not, whether deliberately or inadvertently, null, $PWD or any prefix,
/, or other significant standard paths.)

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -