X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=Qe0
	kSc9fSTDa1K+WHkC1RUVW9hLE7AGx386gf8UvM+uNeFsZMwt68JbnOhR9/LTbokR
	6O0fQVdkERqLF+zG0OZvFlf7fjNYiPoBmPYGPjxWVgpT9RDMaTzYBaQK36tQzxXQ
	2ULb+H0ly+puzUucNloVX6/vCTfGx6cBknwxk/VU=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=default; bh=F8q6Kw8XC
	qAMoZ/4tUDwN256gCw=; b=n52fmCjqXjGo0aBXxm8QvwkSZfPGAj6fyWGB38rFJ
	FZDNTI5bq2Z1Jf4gTARH8ZBrhnHyku2Q5/rvNEJI8vehzEevaf7P+G58F6No8yB9
	tRtYvnFVN4Xue0QfOGvP9Ycpvqp47IHFJkht8VYqYPIt2Gd7tEymwk0hQOAqeDlj
	kg=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,CYGWIN_OWNER_BODY,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:local, Win, systematic, H*F:D*biz
X-HELO:	mailrelay.dillinger.de
From:	"PAULUS, Raimund, TI-ABN" <Raimund DOT Paulus AT dillinger DOT biz>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: RPC clnt_create() adress already in use
Date:	Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:54:03 +0000
Message-ID:	<59D90AF8D70E9740907BACDE2BCB520836F2555E@RESW102.resdom01.local>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id w1R9sIjG027206

High Corinna,

is it possible to get the patched cygwin1.dll for Cygwin 2.5.1? I have to support several older Win XP SP3 boxes.

Raimund

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] Im Auftrag von Corinna Vinschen
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 15:20
An: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Betreff: Re: RPC clnt_create() adress already in use

On Feb  6 11:29, PAULUS, Raimund, TI-ABN wrote:
> On Feb  5 15:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb  5 14:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Feb  5 12:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > What potential solutions to this problem do we have?
> > > > 
> > > > - bindresvport could enforce SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE temporarily to make
> > > >   sure bind fails.
> > > 
> > > Nope, no way.  Even enforcing SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE results in the 
> > > second bind succeeding and the subsequent connect failing.  The 
> > > entire SO_REUSEADDR/SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE semantics only works as 
> > > desired on the server side apparently
> > > 
> > > > - bindresvport could check every local address for being free prior
> > > >   to calling bind.  However, there's a potential race here.
> > > > 
> > > > - DisconnectEx?  Never tried this Winsock extension but it might be
> > > >   worth a shot.
> > 
> > I think I have a very simple solution for the scenario which calls 
> > bindresvport with port number.  Still looking for a solution for the 
> > second problem...
> 
> I've pushed a few patches and uploaded new developer snapshots to 
> https://cygwin.com/snapshots.  Please give them a try.
> 
> with the snapshot of cygwin1.dll and using bindresvport() from Cygwin 
> for libtirpc (instead of the original bindresvport() from libtirpc) 
> all my testcases work without error.
> 
> Many thanks
> Raimund

Thanks for testing.  Please note that this should work most of the time, but is still not 100% foolproof.  There's a systematic race between checking existing connections and calling bind which can't be easily worked around by Cygwin.  Still, should be better than before :}


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -