X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:reply-to:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=hbHdLYJD6o/9Gjpc
	7zt8zhezFzvjVLmvmddy7ty5+/UBfbAWKTtgdw5TBEoKdcP6lerK7i02+DBbg1Jc
	01Z0CcnXBygy2OFQj22Tms3/mPMu+TKNGmzirjoU3tweIu+AGllPYb5hiyJjW7zx
	MOIzVa1qdasINI/BOZY/I4EtlJ4=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:reply-to:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=u/VQIwkDxVbLs09DEKbDgo
	dI9Eo=; b=sdNpnC5CUmBMHcARa0ITpPVgQAMf4wHJD/SA2I/G3t7bPY1hnL4NjS
	4kzV3wrTY7Wj6TImTg8MDccFGUBDtUb9jhNEsGa+kQhBbc6h7YPkf0ZKbajGmVk/
	Ap6YtkxGiEQiMdU0N4AMEQd/ZruihIydVHrchiTEL5g7msldfpKxg=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=UD:co.uk
X-HELO:	smtp-out-1.tiscali.co.uk
Subject:	Re: Future of 32-bit distro
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<98715417-cabe-7b0f-8767-fd114cc929e8 AT t-online DOT de> <1185EB5F-53C1-4F84-BB14-4424F8C60074 AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org> <20180112091344 DOT GA20334 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <c5811365-3b30-5cd6-e4fe-c72fd26d618d AT cygwin DOT com>
From:	David Stacey <drstacey AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<ec5514e4-d603-8290-b9ec-dabd3168e0b3@tiscali.co.uk>
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2018 09:11:47 +0000
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<c5811365-3b30-5cd6-e4fe-c72fd26d618d@cygwin.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4wfL0QBjOG2Pi0aU6L7I1Ql7r2Wx59uxYnx7MaBjXZWUc88hTDgXc0IOX0sZOfWetzjxNL7vP1jFqPPrZNlfGb4cdaZ8ahB7lGSNaCjB9K3pop7u6CBgE8 /1V9SGdluuFKLi6FHZ2alHHdmlPmhGpt1fZofOZbalpDUdB70/0X6qHo
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 12/01/18 18:11, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> If it is not possible for the entire 32-bit distribution to function as
> a whole, is it time to reconsider how much we provide for 32-bit?  And
> when can we just drop 32-bit entirely?

I suspect there are a great number of people running 32-bit Windows, 
even if the underlying hardware is capable of running 64-bit. For that 
reason, I would argue against dropping 32-bit support at the moment - 
even if it increases my work as a package maintainer.

Would it be possible for 'setup_x86.exe' to give a warning if run on a 
64-bit OS? That might help.

Dave.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -