delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2018/01/12/15:42:22

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
default; b=XPNm5xsK1jdWYGZb+eZNbZXcy30Zm2Anw8fF9kci61mWpMB8c0umn
WyByRSkIloYFXdQFlI4Pc9N0jYoIlcD42epV8HrRfwkq204UfAbo6mepiEF/1ZLM
1u+yryMn2ur+ctEEylkN+gPCSwQwuYyIaqMqFt1KLWUyl/5b1wOPZA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
bh=0vbO1gyI+JmOzdxWUKyk1ktlJsY=; b=NaqKuU5HetJxckbc4oMm2iCbyBg+
+3NjH4V2c7Bmqyu83TlpI9jjdGsYmzAkcw1xbpPHXXFwVdNl4oveDyEtlOlOrg/G
oevOdhXi5KJ4g32Z5RSw6FA6skNINmiCiTBi4i+NSDWiZFxoSZ54zTQgMco3dF3I
lLPUJ/ub3BTSB/U=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-100.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=fastest, assist
X-HELO: drew.franken.de
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:41:49 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: calloc speed difference
Message-ID: <20180112204149.GF24623@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CAD8GWsvxzFe0dPnxO-odTY+EG5XOAApLjcOSN5d7vXhtLW0GmQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <46515148-9f8e-6eae-69f9-9bf20921097a AT t-online DOT de> <20180112143339 DOT GE24623 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <b7ab3fe3-fa81-432d-33ad-9c0d7948b044 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b7ab3fe3-fa81-432d-33ad-9c0d7948b044@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

--mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Jan 12 14:59, cyg Simple wrote:
> On 1/12/2018 9:33 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jan 12 15:06, Christian Franke wrote:
> >> Timing [cm]alloc() calls without actually using the allocated memory m=
ight
> >> produce misleading results due to lazy page allocation and/or zero-fil=
ling.
> >>
> >> MinGW binaries use calloc() from msvcrt.dll. This calloc() does not ca=
ll
> >> malloc() and then memset(). It directly calls:
> >>
> >>   mem =3D HeapAlloc(_crtheap, HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, size);
> >>
> >> which possibly only reserves allocate-and-zero-fill-on-demand pages for
> >> later.
> >>
> >> Cygwin's calloc() is different.
> >=20
> > But then again, Cygwin's malloc *is* slow, particulary in
> > memory-demanding multi-threaded scenarios since that serializes all
> > malloc/free calls.
> >=20
> > The memory handling within Cygwin is tricky.  Attempts to replace good
> > old dlmalloc with a fresher jemalloc or ptmalloc failed, but that only
> > means the developer (i.e., me, in case of ptmalloc) was too lazy...
> > busy! I mean busy... to pull this through.
> >=20
> > Having said that, if somebody would like to take a stab at replacing
> > dlmalloc with something leaner, I would be very happy and assist as
> > much as I can.
>=20
> Corina, how reliable is the Cygwin time function on a non-Cygwin
> executable?  Isn't this a comparison of apples to oranges?

I wasn't comparing, in fact.  I was just saying that Cygwin's malloc
is slow, partially because dlmalloc is not the fastest one, partially
due to the serialization overhead in multithreading scenarios.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEoVYPmneWZnwT6kwF9TYGna5ET6AFAlpZHY0ACgkQ9TYGna5E
T6DJZhAAlevW+W46bDuOk7rCuB9VBPHqR5g7EhBQAg/CxB7bkQKU6QMv0WGz1q4J
QJONOYP5I2ry7z+Snhk1noG43UAlo8TTwNAAI6ubO224PLg4krkUolSmyh/UaodD
vJ/I7S44+5Ykmj98T5RHqR+0JB8wqN8nQhlPMYsYVzFVOCK5klnb2CNtTALB/8Pc
zdhG0GLcjEwmG9j7nuwX9nxELEngkB4lZ7cW26xYeUX6lp3TJ4rLk21SYJLD0jol
MInf9PZFXjQmsZIH3gJ2Ij4b7KrnmmZ1z8C7MWDyntn4PaJgJX+XxSOikh0kHOlm
gOVeAPVlKMZb//SPuJCEJ4F/8dQo49opUgSyXEAeDyr8b+iacLtE+FA/6ihfPAyc
+nZuUZbkfuJjdA4eB4+yz/sQwsLvEJ9MU7J+SwcVujjFja0e1+2IcP4TLb5GU1qt
h9FznDDGVXbYCGqMYBzK6souhpr9wKbsbvPgFTQXJJDlG4z52MDN2QGIGSJaFoJi
v4XKZ70TGzbV0hh4kvFn4zriCbKtieq/HJcybtPJ8BJcDvxNLoPTIpdjRKgRpeIM
f6Q0Y+qWrSTVGuJ8NJHNG0BwvajA9aJ69LUrxBNFqdoRhx4Y4r4S6HJPpyF9TwSo
5x6SiJexR43fWtRdDxYlZjNKwKz4r4sEspwZXm4bIaOex0aq6RE=
=C5uz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019