X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=CBun0oW
	Llcis6HbNfZfWV1AFL1Is3Ha1trxuf7f6FnQckRAi7IWJWMRxrRV1EZRnThj7Mt2
	QYlFnaTFyFkmScQSkzU8pMq9tHV7UNbTcKMCtWeIV4G/9kCpWRj3K4n/gRmU5mf5
	/+CNMukEoepLV7F8nhs72Mmbd55Tq48I7lk0=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=sm0PXy7oajyOn
	SZiV7/LvzU9GEw=; b=uLnZ51AWTbZu73r8X8FjylGCgAZB/u4DA3ZEyo2Sm9kk2
	NQPkttpbVQ+19en8E4/B9F7Q1lgEDZdDzjzK59KNeLGlQOOSKxkJGmGFW7KoniZK
	Y4yGCEwgfq6x5wzK+gY6GdSroh2MEjXvjDTqF06bnWnV21xsjycJ4FxK8SGJ4E=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Stephen, meet
X-HELO:	mail-lf0-f46.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Tm9a/aASW9DuEEN9gWsQl3go9JvYvBzwtYpBi6UqTnE=; b=HNTjLS4wlnt/unmmrrKj7CKSwl152UhZ6Kx4yd4QHNsvDl85rcOVW7AvhwgwYb8BAq plfs8ErWmIl/Ny8NMAMDP1U2vLq+IMMRNKg2Tm7f97FHQjt6AdXLGqp2YV7uC4pBmXgD XwK0RyhY5Umz0O7d8FGwfoZPTPoeLCyAqTL8BsPLyKLgOsUeoGqph10uVM1Qbt2P4b/J fK1mL4ponuCHgF5m27/5P08m999VU7XFJiBQyKkfnmRRgOP3puk4j63eXEbc0waPhdc6 418iEr8TQvYxlVLGzBJqRQp15Co5fBvJTkF/jEsQ866dGV0sY5oNJdjJJva36LayLwZy 8efQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AKGB3mIwOf6r8GFlo8nMCrvlqhr1xRVofj5NOzOM6BbvBnhgR0vtDMzg 8EOBi2fnHQJ3hauqQw8N0/DkAZkUYo2EO9Jd9evHHQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ACJfBouTHCkxLjEZA5W8+O8jsA7ODD7g+HVwcLL+9CBggFyyalUMrENMasfKSsDPWhkQ7dsV1NwoNA0xDy54GCTWwRs=
X-Received:	by 10.46.18.216 with SMTP id 85mr22742125ljs.100.1514760432202; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 14:47:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5a49530b.1d0b9d0a.17c20.f7f6@mx.google.com>
References:	<5a49530b DOT 1d0b9d0a DOT 17c20 DOT f7f6 AT mx DOT google DOT com>
From:	Stephen John Smoogen <smooge AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 31 Dec 2017 17:47:11 -0500
Message-ID:	<CANnLRdj19K15+do5bqyY1-MCB7O3qS+By58gaAUTgtvE=C2JRA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: flex package POSIX violation
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 31 December 2017 at 16:13, Steven Penny <svnpenn AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> The POSIX standard, at least since 1997 [1], requires the presence of a
> "lex"
> utility.
>
> Most systems (including Cygwin) provide a Lex implementation via the "flex"
> package. However with other OS, a "lex -> flex" symlink is provided, whereas
> the
> Cygwin package does not.
>
> Please resolve this, thanks.
>

How POSIX compliant is Cygwin supposed to be? I don't think many of
the tools are 100% POSIX compliant but are good enough so does making
the symlink between flex and lex make it more compliant or less so
because the tool doesn't meet 100% compliance?





-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -