delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2017/12/15/23:00:48

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:to:subject:references
:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=DILVvIBWzCsCW98Ilu9tsZDjhYqE7
MjrMPB7YC5fALTIoC8FGkOvDrsj1sojkL114HeLeJqR6XNFN5XJ4edYODyBWLBSz
BYp66kbFfJYrXBDe/9vPYgptnMXLUv4XMjMN+n698IIZ9MFa4SHFP7nKQSSGD9Ko
uDzQ6RnhdudK2E=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:to:subject:references
:content-type; s=default; bh=nAHS0qUk7xh7nfPT1auoBTbvco8=; b=UUB
OnMjgObiYofZpLEYV2YrkWdbOHU+NDPO4kMKyeJmXA3qEh56OG46yMRBBCncVRwf
xXdXjIUEPvDQfITzIiL1HLwOdp6HFXGWT3p5/jgQwYSkGfTxH7mdnkwKmfvWe1f7
XkdH1HE19jDRlaW27o1GsUbDfWQOV8iQCV89qIBM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Gecko, gecko, offer, H*UA:github.com
X-HELO: mail-ot0-f176.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:to:subject:references :user-agent; bh=toGISqT1CcuegXRi2cKD2l88QXNPGJlW3xXaS8DbS5A=; b=IRJv1afcsOnP+WHITzcAWCbzjY1+BYBkXJuhL7NCfXqJH46xJEsz6TUGDubPc5zUNE pk6Ab3RmrKzgfNo02pAN7zBvFBZSGrsY2oot3EZHDWgN3quz90pwqRPU9PkIK+Xj+yGS sfSe5NNnCOzUhPGZD+uU0K0+6EsM1VViBxkoGLXWKsA3lvGosBmei8whOvchXKZA1/cp MjYuEumZZ4PGRM9d4cVITj66EhnEpkt4cQYqk3uQmTo4h4FJEHqYqv7OKNh3aQRpv1vt nXvNbXg5shUW6cBe9fKGlv05ePU4p/n1rQ9BZ3XbYhXHJagoN1wBUQn7gt5GMourxEad NVhg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJYYUkxGAVH6wj3hdzFRdWJ0fx9nsWPJmTXwMBlRYgv952OTxqH y7hNIAu4r+rZRNgYi8q4BRaj2A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou9vQblE1x0MJfbuAkwX5YTNp9i+zMGsxJ/fQDAZ5OJtrAwPMnB1/UtxtFZc/rZ3Ruu3A7hQw==
X-Received: by 10.157.2.9 with SMTP id 9mr1077724otb.130.1513396825484; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:00:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5a349a58.0a66ca0a.570e8.714d@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:00:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Steven Penny <svnpenn AT gmail DOT com>
X-Google-Original-From: Steven Penny
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: setup's response to a "corrupt local copy"
References: <94A36026-06D9-4BD2-BFC5-68D5005D0071 AT solidrocksystems DOT com>
User-Agent: Tryst/2.0.1 (github.com/svnpenn/tryst)

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:50:44, Vince Rice wrote:
> It's my computer. I don't want setup (or anything else) replacing files on it
> it doesn't know about without at least asking whether that's what I want it to
> do. Setup's current behavior is exactly what it should be, IMO. If, as has
> been mentioned, someone wants to offer an *option* to replace, either with or
> without a question, then great. But the default should be to leave something
> it doesn't know about alone.

Thankfully we dont need your opinion on this matter, as we can simply fall back
to facts, as I will now do. Let us bring some sanity to this thread, shall we?

Exhibit A
====================
Package manager: APT
Reference distro: Lubuntu http://lubuntu.me
Cache: /var/cache/apt

Exhibit B
====================
Package manager: DNF
Reference distro: Fedora http://spins.fedoraproject.org/lxde
Cache: /var/cache/dnf
Option: keepcache=True

Exhibit C
=====================
Package manager: ZYpp
Reference distro: Gecko LXQt http://geckolinux.github.io
Cache: /var/cache/zypp
Option: --keep-packages

In all cases, these package managers remove invalid archives without warning.
Why should setup.exe be any different? I eagerly await your referenced and
reasoned rebuttal.

Cheers


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019