X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:reply-to:to:message-id
	:subject:mime-version:references:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=pnhuZLwOefhxuO3U
	XfI82cjsz0Vh/3oLXzhZpbKHlPOGJBQGN8pOsQoDs7UYg/8pHe56pJwwLMqAAFB4
	7FOlFhpNXvRpGPujVnXV18Ppl42sGu2il5w3eY7MavVEVhq3SOSrqsGdqI7bvUIV
	Cf23/UiBbhcrr5amReKt2R1WmDE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:reply-to:to:message-id
	:subject:mime-version:references:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=iQ5m15D5p0tu/K5dw0zkZh
	rb0q0=; b=GHrvIkShByf2HJNOewy+j8m9xzJcmzgDREcehnUGbDk82PhmfPk8I2
	6IU6u9rsI9DOlqwi87RsqeKB3Be8XkZFIguhQJixBb4uk9uytPbE+qux4v+9t5si
	Z/sowYQKNk+rcf1znhsfTLxbTkSgqbSHS+YOyVioBz60jomPPKMAw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*UA:x64, H*UA:Win64, H*x:Win64, H*x:x64
X-HELO:	sonic302-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Date:	Fri, 1 Dec 2017 17:02:14 +0000 (UTC)
From:	"Xiaofeng Liu via cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Xiaofeng Liu <liuxf09 AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	Xiaofeng Liu <liuxf09 AT yahoo DOT com>
To:	The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID:	<1470375482.5430561.1512147734234@mail.yahoo.com>
Subject:	fseek(...,SEEK_CUR) calls _fflush_r(ptr, fp) in read only mode
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<1470375482 DOT 5430561 DOT 1512147734234 DOT ref AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id vB1H2Z5k014547

In ftello.c, it intentionally skipped fflush for read mode:
https://github.com/openunix/cygwin/blob/master/newlib/libc/stdio/ftello.c#L121

/* Find offset of underlying I/O object, then adjust for buffered     bytes.  Flush a write stream, since the offset may be altered if     the stream is appending.  Do not flush a read stream, since we     must not lose the ungetc buffer.  */  if (fp->_flags & __SWR)    _fflush_r (ptr, fp);
But in fseeko.c, when fseek(..., SEEK_CUR) requires to get the current position first. But it calls _fflush_r(ptr, fp) in read mode, which screwed up the current position after fflush. 
https://github.com/openunix/cygwin/blob/master/newlib/libc/stdio/fseeko.c#L174


For my job, if I skip _fflush_r for read only mode in fseek(..., SEEK_CUR), the job runs OK. 
Considering fseek(..., SEEK_CUR) is a basic call, could my understanding be wrong? 
Thanks.
Xiaofeng Liu
--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -