delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2017/11/11/13:28:50

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:from:subject:reply-to:to:references:message-id
:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=e+0gIspLl1raWRPv
Lme6snRMTtZijx7Xn42rHhcoQvx6SMsprFKI5u3i9SumX6E1WVFwe3+H9fbUfVde
/zY05Yr/17dLdJfy+R2ZTSzIgEAbE04OVPlwn0u8xvvjG2yrrIsl0fN57HfDO9sI
SJMe2pJgAlLCm/WCJ27eZyBnHMw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:from:subject:reply-to:to:references:message-id
:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=3D2q3Tv6CUfYgp7zpoXHrT
fRe6U=; b=yyPeVFs7nfyWFAcTrkbTdv0thB78ClHQ1EN9nSIpG9EffND6PqVPhp
NLEG92N5ErGG7VcrEiw/z69K1W07bp6H9oirzBaJzCaCOUv0T2ks7qRACjbCf8rJ
+mDVkluxK6xE7+qN/IEELHjMj/lm6h5wnfkchzUu4HINys0PZCY04=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=e552ceh/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:117 a=MVEHjbUiAHxQW0jfcDq5EA==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=--ovKUIQjZTk_BGyGNYA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Subject: Re: Requesting updated unzip for Zip64 Support
Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CAK0ZC5WbOAHpy9RFGAg8VWq95rH5VBNA9bA=SPv1jMHRBNT9gQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <a617bc64-d913-cb98-c5cf-2877d8f6eb4d AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> <CAK0ZC5U36i2ZyH_DA1fZ4v3jVAm-n43U7XnzD7CgavOMyqrb5Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID: <6967c50a-c621-0450-8779-da35aa0ac703@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:28:34 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAK0ZC5U36i2ZyH_DA1fZ4v3jVAm-n43U7XnzD7CgavOMyqrb5Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfHyK5Fe21XOS7i15cLMM/QlLG1c0TbQsjoTriodBEGJh21VJdDIEZAGFrKSfDssFFJ8b9TQ4tXxOS5Z/6yQG+GCjiJsvDzY2m3T+hHBfjxc05Xy9obDn 1JwRegCQJo3IdTxqQe/lzURckq4+VcQ93nlCYwzJcGRqdjZUT66hRHkklpxmrTWPJKu8mybD0mD/hw==
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2017-11-10 08:07, OwN-3m-All wrote:
> Strange, for some reason the current version would fail on some very large
> archives (8GB+), but the version I linked worked fine in these cases too.

That's Large File Support for 4GB+ files and archives, which is also in current
versions. There could be bugs. Could you test on different systems to check?

Above GB sizes I prefer RAR, although zpaq and p7zip can be better, and p...z
utilities that parallel compress using all cores, to get close to 10% of the
original size, with better alternatives getting more than .1GB smaller than RAR.
Most orgs that deal with large archives over the net accept and produce RAR and
some can also accept and produce high compression alternatives.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019