delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2017/10/19/14:40:14

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id
:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=sYz1AhRCP3ING/YI
584cyTXpYbjvVg2xwh7XZ1qVnwhdYgQaL0XW3ashOdGJvfrY3OLarLDu5neYvA0f
56uXQ5r+Ux9uFNE5Fdux8wyHeXNQibFZCjnMnxT4eVEYnLrROA7NNlTDvzLVnT+F
aAUU8nJeXm4NOJxxS323uLDZAjo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id
:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=W4uiiYRx2oBfUeOtzyXbVY
0TJFE=; b=Gp8+/NQr9RQnPsRVJHCVOXkEQ+e7utH0JLYVeOYghMsz21lRgcQoxT
PyOariS4ICZGx7nxJMEEQ44HKJiBDaSydz5sIAhyToAih/1SGjGkcJE05klOGqLz
aHjUlqsd0skuOOzSB3TJvvySRvctAh1P8nstdu1nWoqaZm3zi7jxM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=delivering, Hx-languages-length:898, refuses, Automake
X-HELO: mail-it0-f41.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=foJzstZXxTvT9ggm1v+l/ncc88E/vPgFe3PdvrtKvjY=; b=qgrE/1FI1/Bzx04CELu9wQnnhixt7OVJ/AjFqmEO/AnmYd5ksg3wUywG3XiSWs9FHS WYhjZa38zouzadNLDadg5DxjMq9gCnNksj2zZRpBGfVWnBMWPHA3BTanVyITQ6WM/Tt4 XTlBEbUlRNJn77Dx2JUScVa1ro27AaixHk6ek50FXeukicBQOT58V/b9QCTf1G6e4ZoE y1SQmf6f2HBhJzTg7JSiEsLWHMtG+NhvwagtpNmiBiGOJhUDgC4r9AzQfDWyV7+yZPRB SNLyxkSXK8UD0KsYT1oVyOrXFrW5eQ4FC1usnFPu/XgFynR9eECvWiEO8Rx6d80ed/wZ SilQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXq4qh3o3OuqnZv+aOFgseGsu8csP1/eYSvhkuDZ0VWoImlqKnY YNsSqKFejN76AJFxlqrGuNSk7w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QXgXMDrRIfWG1xvYEIQRwtf7BqeBM63pGVx9j8n3KJNeNcDvCIOziTcFOOv3905GFch67yHw==
X-Received: by 10.36.176.13 with SMTP id d13mr3563255itf.107.1508438399808; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 11:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <7983d97c-3c6d-e3c2-2304-9527ad4c5735 AT gmail DOT com> <59e8f0cd DOT 28279d0a DOT 292b DOT 4768 AT mx DOT google DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: cyg Simple <cygsimple AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID: <e3abcc71-e085-4355-41de-c6ab30cc4c85@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:40:00 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <59e8f0cd.28279d0a.292b.4768@mx.google.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 10/19/2017 2:37 PM, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:47:29, cyg Simple wrote:
>> > may we know which package ?
>> > > If it refuses triplet has a strange way to use Autoconf/Automake
>> > and changing the compiler seems the wrong way to solve the issue
>>
>> No, it doesn't matter.  Delivering x86_64-pc-cygwin anything is wrong
>> since the triplet is x86_64-unknown-cygwin.
> 
> Wrong. It does matter. By failing to provide a package you are in
> violation of
> MCVE:
> 
> http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve
> 
> and deserve 0 help. If you want help, you need to give people enough so
> that
> they can help you. Otherwise Yaakov is right:
> 
>> circular discussion of a nonexistent problem
> 

So you support the maintainers supplying an incorrect triplet?

x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issues.

-- 
cyg Simple

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019