X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=oHrk
	+zfFGrTSIuTl43a6UBH60C2O2vN7Q30EN4hgLJBokk41pHcps+XEuna5ZlS5ohb3
	h5fpVdK8g2PC2qjlxPMC18XsD1LibM5GwRz0IlBaxoLc+00DASXQfJ6vxLTfLNq+
	tJUwWYJxFotMcuErSt66QUD2C5x+NhVMXIwS8bU=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=iof6Zl9tfE
	X7G/8SF32cwG/77O8=; b=KtIaHuuKEW6YJ6ve2uDqkRuB6OWOV9sC/Kghtlxphj
	3lGi2dHDlBTY0IjVd9Lk++mhd0ZvYf+r0ZrwwrNwn9mYolFv31SAhxyNusAxuDvU
	STxMacZTWPgtUXBLucyZ/yh7QDRAWd29Z6QoU2ljJm0PiX1uR80g3vK4nbleRIMP
	o=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:2001, penny, x86_64i686, UD:msg00182.html
X-HELO:	mail-pf0-f169.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=G5UXzggoWmThf78+jW/Tf9kO5yLJ9dieZh+fT60H8PI=; b=C2ir6r3kSVXBI1IayxbzVhPVsom4KMXmvTDNuw15mGzgzYo9VyQgDLPtjCWDOn3Cv7 KwD38wBg4qTxdy5m407dq/bgbJgyaPcVq/NCAVT9YYSh/fWny9oJY8jLVEWR1bh9rhy2 JBwEaz4UcE+GDD/5zCm/N3myvVL1aZfVhxi7H3vaCzBKyBEYqYdiz8GAadoZTv7YzaGe VhBtFXUqXaxbn8GrRi9bKSSLpHWox0BymFYYlRMW7Rz4j7LEnJzEFFOx1Xg39XnPejHw 02HTlUlJzmcFkh8qjR7pihBLWy31NVdPDvA2FmtmOmK928dIqna050SpiMrdoP/wHB0m MFoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AMCzsaUlRoIch8h6qPdrd4D4UTHDZQGSx9ZVT0QIgfoZRsXgxWxuRBDu 3a7dpsdZp80yF9cOn89RKjY/wQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AOwi7QDedpGDage7dWbJY4URI8xsuAQYfLG61nR39weCbBkSMUdti8E23N0jruXJDn/R+ZK9ITlDDg==
X-Received:	by 10.99.113.29 with SMTP id m29mr13289732pgc.309.1508311853424; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [Updated] mingw64-{i686,x86_64} binutils, gcc (Test)
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT d671e750-1486-707d-8641-4594357002c9 AT gmail DOT com> <59e5edce DOT 8237ca0a DOT 705b2 DOT 909e AT mx DOT google DOT com>
From:	JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<9b4ea17e-1388-6f32-0419-c7ecc29bbf59@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:29:25 +0000
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<59e5edce.8237ca0a.705b2.909e@mx.google.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

--aId4EUAG3OhEp6qbKx2L9i823w8EHcgXG
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="hBvhhAwhoF2cexlM7vOMMgKfTCqwt2HWM";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <9b4ea17e-1388-6f32-0419-c7ecc29bbf59 AT gmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [Updated] mingw64-{i686,x86_64} binutils, gcc
 (Test)
References: <announce DOT d671e750-1486-707d-8641-4594357002c9 AT gmail DOT com>
 <59e5edce DOT 8237ca0a DOT 705b2 DOT 909e AT mx DOT google DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <59e5edce DOT 8237ca0a DOT 705b2 DOT 909e AT mx DOT google DOT com>


--hBvhhAwhoF2cexlM7vOMMgKfTCqwt2HWM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 10/17/2017 11:47 AM, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 14:16:07, JonY wrote:
>> The mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated:
>>
>> * mingw64-i686-binutils-2.28.1.12c1f20d
>> * mingw64-i686-gcc-6.3.0-1
>> * mingw64-x86_64-binutils-2.28.1.12c1f20d
>> * mingw64-x86_64-gcc-6.3.0-1
>=20
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-08/msg00182.html
>=20
> Can mingw64-{x86_64,i686}-gcc move to Current? These were released about 2
> months ago, and it seems the only issue was with binutils, which has
> already
> been fixed and moved to current. Please and thank you.
>=20

Sure, I'll bump it soon, thanks for testing.



--hBvhhAwhoF2cexlM7vOMMgKfTCqwt2HWM--

--aId4EUAG3OhEp6qbKx2L9i823w8EHcgXG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=TQ8T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--aId4EUAG3OhEp6qbKx2L9i823w8EHcgXG--

- Raw text -