X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=pCFeV2CmbtC944GY
	OQ1xI7xjaRYQDSxwQdvmjREmdNXLIemaFwpJaWr02dgNK7ixNxwZoSllBL3xvPvn
	V/Vx5NiMV1pRJNnHov8xfKCHQMRpibUTQWiSSHqGTmOPfunxyepkcdtmNCj9PfEO
	12V0y4qQUtCvEiBPdYGXDMDhDQg=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Pgw1+owChZ/x1u+TAAOUIo
	6up4w=; b=X6R0ZwFfLwn/m0X8j7KoFf9k58ZBrqAvyu/tkvHwYG/HcM/nV8WKpi
	izdjTuQ/SIQmfTErl3sOwqMgnTfmJBt8onimkFxhLi5CgfOf/5d1HpcukUHtHtk0
	8a3x71dXf+bGZPm+meBnu0bTAxuFRRNnrd80oyNPyHdU68lHm2Se4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Walton, walton, pthread_attr_t=e2, noloader AT gmail DOT com?=
X-HELO:	mail-wm0-f49.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ASPVwhX6X8IOujks1Dwph60kVg64TwgzgMRlMU9KCnM=; b=LL8gX7LLHRmxMoftdqC9fdZtrjebnFwHVBbi/8ncXBcAviKPqvp+7V5/dC3WR2TYFN WEB8PjdmrsgJyDGIRuJfopgsc7zCgMldE/nNlOZHc/mgjJ8+e99fH8vC6AlPgCoXiqIv 1WqBnipXU0dGzZS7hD8Ls08k5Swq4nRAy91wg2kPL1Q5LU+iICIBv4MkM8kpTPqjHs3L BEWE3pk5hnI9f5KxSSgk3IaVbFwasjF3t2bfE9ggioK2gZBtgkROAqUT+ZRHPatf7N9r e3wgDh8fNbwEoIQ5bI10E887KQ5GF9k6k5J27m05c0pKssxnCrWMNdABqC4qPOotA/bZ pEPg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AMCzsaW4Nu3vJgdYr6fb+pahJdY4Yub9CUrrSFxHsfYJnQEiZamC59wV X/OUIpz25LZHerx840TJjMuSUg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AOwi7QBq6B10su77yJhBVWTJiOYnlJm2bo9Y8UiP11tz6NZCYCMqZP/Cs0CD5SPxLV2Vb+cTAsNALA==
X-Received:	by 10.80.158.207 with SMTP id a73mr11522823edf.90.1508144145280; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 01:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	=?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Error:_unknown_type_name_=e2=80=98pthread=5fattr=5ft?= =?UTF-8?B?4oCZIGluIHNpZ25hbC5o?=
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAH8yC8=eY+bFd=t_4-UKFk+JnfamzQspzxFVpRdVT571LjBERQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAH8yC8n+Dbr6ANUKrcnF+X2c_KWoJBDYXxmtTZyNHA1b1F7oAw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<590379dd-cffa-0b32-4d77-b043ddfe1457@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:55:36 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAH8yC8n+Dbr6ANUKrcnF+X2c_KWoJBDYXxmtTZyNHA1b1F7oAw@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 16/10/2017 10:39, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>

> 
> I think something is borked with the Cygwin headers. If I am parsing
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_02.html
> and https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-01/msg00642.html correctly, it
> should be sufficient to define _XOPEN_SOURCE to 600. From the section
> "The _XOPEN_SOURCE Feature Test Macro":
> 
> Since this volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 is aligned with the ISO C
> standard, and since all functionality enabled by _POSIX_C_SOURCE set
> equal to 200112L is enabled by _XOPEN_SOURCE set equal to 600, there
> should be no need to define _POSIX_C_SOURCE if _XOPEN_SOURCE is so
> defined. Therefore, if _XOPEN_SOURCE is set equal to 600 and
> _POSIX_C_SOURCE is set equal to 200112L, the behavior is the same as
> if only _XOPEN_SOURCE is defined and set equal to 600...
> 

> 
> I would still appreciate some help in working around the compile failures.
> 
> Jeff
> 

hi Jeff,

see
   /usr/include/sys/features.h
for explanation of the current behaviour and options



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -