X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=b1He3oTXWrxkAofk
	JhJAoZHhhjdwhOSL9/nyc29iH/VP3hL02mxciztT2buszIvUm6flghTHBXabHLIH
	wC3zwOUO7DTOTerTiytxGmZPlJZLxmkaVDdNgHnaBdXyienwVBFCF4Cx9bwD85eN
	g/jDXqdip6fnghxbAdg1xXDS7Fs=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=8Y97t4iZShonW9uG22VMkx
	JNITw=; b=A8LsxnDMK/5HyBLnoZaR4lfFllds9EyN15De57enGnpWQTf8oBpyVZ
	PaC1M6wdsdhAXYQ+ExTT8TZJ9RXYYXRFnWKaFt+vARlTSNSmdcIq+3pdtVlQCYKN
	rxMH5eac9g5+ZDLUqf029+vR9euDLP9KE+vI2+xr/kb14kj6WKOsE=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=preferably, Indeed, H*M:c0ac, enjoy
X-HELO:	mout.gmx.net
Subject:	Re: Dependency issues in setup.ini.
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<505405e4-5a2f-8d6b-f012-404bd7d69009 AT gmx DOT com> <216159991 DOT 20170930120008 AT yandex DOT ru> <171d601b-59c2-f186-5213-12c6b6f493cd AT gmx DOT com> <19010162357 DOT 20170930142314 AT yandex DOT ru>
From:	Sam Edge <sam DOT edge AT gmx DOT com>
Message-ID:	<c6a001dc-1940-cdfd-c0ac-144c6f697f5c@gmx.com>
Date:	Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:15:14 +0100
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<19010162357.20170930142314@yandex.ru>
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V01:K0:9QfoP8fa3WQ=:9614LArNRAEqVNg1BiihVO Vs8uzLVG/jBgJO+rehIPfMv1ssWF6h+76Q3Msm7e5BXDzFhEr3xyE8mC4iF+syudf9d+rt5pv qvoepI6VwdI8ApiFu+G1ZtTS6O0kjYSD49oJtif3iSHdAnaucmzttr2ZR7N9oRmGYGqnNuxd3 l0KopWtBso7z5zYn5HfC5Qr1VH5PSk0AfVrBREHhb+xYcBAqNtUMjYL6T05aVfFW2T1jmGMfO wiVwDdh4spfvN9a+MKiBYdqyJ9fb+bgG1C23yKTs1Z21K19pLEpAjugGMYPt1f8MMZGrjT/DR 9fXTZXdpFru0JKE+QrsLCMH2YTFGoVD+xkbLajT8p2JCg0hYj/6OBnJ+vQV73N9dAfoy5BgVe P7JqHMW8vNY333lw2X9ETiDGjybQvqVFs6E/RQSbr2sKcZvyaXuoj8DlBwdShfNdlU7/3Tr8M CbuegTo4+j0TEUnmQKX2r8iffa9dkY2LFTx1u9Xn5fIFw+3A4G7CPEkgaUIn1bvo0AD6CzRD5 PciGiHbtlhxu4ooP+b9/bhXzI79KcDtZtlcg1Ag2p/fo825ydRAeRwclavVsmx1Kc8j0TQYCh w8CGjtVYYKo8/IjV/YijtpIiok/dvyCw8D+dVS3201/8SPFS/AX2777/hLa05ixqSUCPZjpkl cX9toQtNYesWL5A8jwuilrBHXGWMCJosVse7It7Oavo7ZPzD/+7UcN+k7MrjS14Cl6evqjw+9 395QWy5rIDgNpbyWATOYf9BKGGvU0SC2Oz2dJc58uNgxrV/43Iq/+bNiWqWohGczbTEvNEzhQ bJOA+gz4+rAiRlpS9J8XW9Sjg2JWvvdrUErWxyaYNCHTwdMFSM=
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 30/09/2017 12:23, Andrey Repin wrote:
>
>> Indeed. However, while off label usage of Cygwin is anathema to me but
>> sometimes I wish 'base' wasn't quite so big and have to pare things down
>> a little once installed, e.g. as part of a makefile- and/or
>> Eclipse-based build tree in source code control.(Which was also one of
>> my motivations for the Python stuff.)
> Rational suggestions are always welcome, I suppose.
> While my own usage of Cygwin is prone to spread thin across all aspects of my
> daily work, I can see situations, where a much smaller subset of packages
> (let's name it "core" or something) would be beneficial. I.e. when packaging
> Cygwin as part of your own application.
>
>
Again, agree. A 'core' package that has enough to get a shell up
(preferably dash not bash) would be very useful.

I don't believe in packaging Cygwin with an application - I'd rather say
"as a prerequisite, you need to have a Cygwin installation newer than
v.X" - but for build systems where you're trying (somewhat in vain
sometimes I know) to attempt deterministic behaviour it would be nice to
have a smaller subset upon which you could add just what's needed,
usually make, grep, sed, cp, mv & rm & maybe a scripter such as awk,
perl, tcl (or python!) depending upon.

Anyway, it's the weekend so I'm off.

Enjoy,
-- 
Sam

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -