X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=vKTEuh/P1hrpUnUG
	d8/LZuUznXVvfAu8QFne9F4cddvzHFMSND062qOAZpwh7TdRJ44V54kS9WhnOovl
	iwD7ieAE6subvBu/n4Zt2h9fO3rsb1PG/EK0HVPH3oErslR0PHcO5/gd6WftadPK
	8Cy7ED5S1X25Gg5n94wdSxc7Ypo=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id
	:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=CeCrpQFVDuOxpVc84fPMmo
	CbcmU=; b=CEa/yHRxfD2ldfarF/vemt6+Rje6aAL8GHjQ9pnU7/jgG56sZaPawt
	qjDi8ChgGUA1widSjtZHz2+K/tn6FaVBXKF3rq4HoK5kkN6brr7uAHJiY5ANCoC8
	LDQOTy7M5UxsrNstLA3WhC2B+pOfyJ2w/QwbTPAVZNv3V9lZVzWs0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*R:D*edu
X-HELO:	mailsrv.cs.umass.edu
Reply-To:	moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
Subject:	Re: Presence of cygwin64 elements in an existing Cygwin 32 install after updating
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAFWoy7G6qey3krstkgwYpjQYoxMejTF18Ds5B-vcA28OG4gU4A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <35eff42d-9022-ddf8-27f6-9a1889544852 AT cornell DOT edu> <CAFWoy7Fbv00KaWv5Yjoxsh4Dwar-S3qH-ma4rt2GU743+k9LBg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAFWoy7F6cyx02qttLQDhjUeK0gezsP2nPtEwdJ3z6s5fOrW8vQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAFWoy7H14=pPmGi0NN5NZZR4u2a0S2dW5-OB9=yq3iiNP3Ebfg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <c100f9f7-f722-f1a3-b10a-158b24aa92e4 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <7910bbfa-5adf-02ec-39a6-a620180c8695 AT gmail DOT com>
From:	Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
Message-ID:	<36c2aa01-c5ca-3f6b-e81d-76ec3a2bb2f0@cs.umass.edu>
Date:	Wed, 30 Aug 2017 08:24:54 -0400
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<7910bbfa-5adf-02ec-39a6-a620180c8695@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

A query related to this:

If I use rebase -si and look at the range of addresses used, what is
the limit that gets exceeded when I have too many DLLs?  In other words,
what should I look for to determine that I *must* have fewer DLLs?

Regards - Eliot (who uses one ell :-) )

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -