X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Z9eIQk26QPDHAwuq
	WbxQpw/T/wGNJWOR+nxeyXi8NCDu0alcvHTNlwyLWp9F0cf4+pvoBeOJvWgSi9mN
	GnDlZtkTbLtLl3o5y3u3RXPR1PcOYT0my5deOxcff2u17RE6JQoPZfAOxKrM63oh
	fIMAx1MA9EcpNPRpjl4UbQqFMWc=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=qaftRbAtfB2LKrVmSoNgS5
	FTzjA=; b=SFqa/Uxlgl4tfWg+zFu7aR+o3GOxF67vgkJ90K3KnZ9UimA1Y023cM
	Th9FJHyhuY003cvRGuqOKmqb94qFA3/aWWr6+6j7+yel5E8TFBgphwVd4TzY4/Wa
	Ibl8ZpJ1Rw2qPaQiqViEeiI6kRHQwT9ycJvMoRxtANHFdTAnyNEkY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO:	mx1.redhat.com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com B9EAA4E4C6
Authentication-Results:	ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com B9EAA4E4C6
Subject:	Re: building libpng-1.6.29 fails with error in signal.h
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<8726022A-425F-4D32-8061-5B749AD62BB8 AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org> <dd6cc3ce-d99a-ea06-46eb-e68d0efd7685 AT gmail DOT com>
From:	Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID:	<4003d202-e983-51ca-378e-a0254173ba11@cygwin.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Jul 2017 18:16:22 -0500
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<dd6cc3ce-d99a-ea06-46eb-e68d0efd7685@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2017-07-04 15:46, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 20:59, Denis Excoffier wrote:
>> I tried to compile libpng-1.6.29 and failed at first. I obtain:
>>
>> /usr/include/cygwin/signal.h:328:34: error: unknown type name 'siginfo_t'
>>      void  (*sa_sigaction) ( int, siginfo_t *, void * );
>>                                   ^
>> I really don't know which (signal.h or libpng) is okay (or none). Will 
>> someone investigate this?
> > Reading
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/signal.h.html
> 
> I have the impression that the current cygwin header behaviour
> is correct as siginfo_t is an extension POSIX.1-2008.

True, but I missed that struct sigaction (which is correctly guarded as 
POSIX.1-1990) uses siginfo_t.  This part needs to be guarded as 
POSIX.1b-1993 without breaking the struct, as is done in glibc.

> In theory "_GNU_SOURCE" should be defined by default

No, I'll fix this in the header shortly, along with updating libpng.

-- 
Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -