X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=w3ERnKoJ5hhYBf/X
	g+QWonxXP9tFPWC10HjyXAyyXBcku3tpRMSI8UEPc0syBZN6fkpP1AX9UWE14e74
	AVFpaIJEike7b2RyHdHcgR/YqTcdVDdBHnqmTdgz6GUg8/rW604h/LXCcyxuS8/8
	UfUA65dVxAUPe/Hq9HZgBNx5VUA=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=oYcDdKPSN6BKQ9VY8QrCkK
	VUiHI=; b=HzkFOmHiYXdza9oPrnpQMpilToxn07ky1YoX25bRslwm5KDQw/KsI5
	coCzVKzQGeDOs+eVA5Uv8Na8/Rtuoilo9b/T07xB799uQk12zKLoWWa/yJJ5/oNW
	Bc5qTbvgrGZk9uM+N8QFu/G7WvVnc1WsZ3+rDWladTDQINR5bGiK8=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Protection, clue, eating, Endpoint
X-HELO:	mail-wr0-f179.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AO73ax0XfuRMvHSG/psYyjU36rT4H3p2szisXvrwo/Q=; b=kqGfJn7TKOv0LObJmeLkNhCGYv0/vgL5/xXIYJpNXbPybLrVRbsovwkkBGz1Cv8Xnw /CQT0jg3ZR2U/NrGJF4dhy80OpWZzMseiiUICdPiZ1Evvm1SsexgYBera+X+zTupVteh muXje+48q9gWHtZjHlYs4Zd0HtkYuowYvFu3dLr7yHNJ4Gft9wz8qmlRaS2Rl4EQUPmz 95AevCGL1hOvml0k0aY4ddYFYI5Aa5R17lWIxZe3X9BeV9nxGF7d1lAVzIdqFgdhp0N0 AHGhlDvqdeTD8VJVJXMVsmX9ibvAWAAns3BhCaNqm92/5ZPcF/uud7zmBoT99hi8tBfm oMCg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AKS2vOxnYfx7ji1hvBE4WFAMiaqtTgRQJbZiTBOzSMyfmK5EOLk5ntPX BMH99ZiB6N+ZnOcDBpM=
X-Received:	by 10.80.226.204 with SMTP id q12mr22402450edl.37.1497979789784; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: cygserver - Postgres Multiple connection Load Testing - Inifinte Loop
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<200408030333 DOT i733XEXn023894 AT mx3 DOT redhat DOT com> <20040803100612 DOT GP31522 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20170321025614 DOT GA2100214 AT tornado DOT leadboat DOT com> <20170324171101 DOT GI29995 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20170328052652 DOT GA2351961 AT tornado DOT leadboat DOT com> <20170402023624 DOT GA2561924 AT tornado DOT leadboat DOT com> <20170507032747 DOT GA876495 AT rfd DOT leadboat DOT com> <590E98DD DOT 9000805 AT cygwin DOT com> <d3103f3b-4b9f-5014-98bb-57be37168218 AT gmail DOT com> <20170620111112 DOT GD8342 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<0df9ad7f-9e9b-57bb-cc82-c0a434224155@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jun 2017 19:29:23 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20170620111112.GD8342@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 20/06/2017 13:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I suggest reverting the cygwin-20170324 cygserver changes for now.  Older
>>>> versions can be configured to have reliable sysv semaphores, but I
>>>> think no
>>>> settings render sysv semaphores reliable in Cygwin 2.8.0.  What do you
>>>> think?
>>>
>>> Just FYI, Corinna is away for a bit (in European time, "a bit" = until
>>> June ;-) ) so don't be surprised if her response is delayed.
>>>
>>
>> as she is back, we can humble rise her attention to the matter.
>
> I can do that, but wouldn't it be nice if somebody would actually
> try to debug Cygserver further, to handle this new testcase correctly
> as well?  6 weeks, and nobody actually tries.  Sigh.
>
>
> Corinna

I agree.

To my discharge:
- I have no clue what to look for, my knowledge of cygwin inside
   is not so good.
- Real life is eating my available time for cygwin.
- The Symantec Endpoint Protection BLODA, that I can not get rid of,
   is making strace impossible and debugging a nightmare.

Sorry
Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -