X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=VpbIEkOOV1Ew9Qq/
	Yk612OZjG064m7jaO2PfX9gKg4ZBNwprPIdnVMYk8jwNXq0EaPQSo9XXD1vZX09E
	FDBBxKUFvCcadprf8PSfYF6pU0gk28klxgvX87EpTCe0g4l8RqPPDecSGZCymbzD
	6l3W5pxWa0wAGCERHAVVWJChEZE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=X1bwrplTt7KUxH4Y0o7SgY
	jr+Gk=; b=mMkq2b0ag03OmSHT7bA8wNVQf8xWmhyDncUOEn7bjI+ntGkwa8coGe
	BpjfApt1Ma63GsRILdt0UljZDDFlcUa7evjk8VG2P217VKZMjRBb6X94ALu2xoW4
	eK0QIdee0yvCzpJUWxQ+LPC5LmK8rbp5cnkvjm6MuSYf/V1P+eJjc=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:D*t-online.de, H*r:sk:mailout
X-HELO:	mailout01.t-online.de
Subject:	Re: CR-LF handling behavior of SED changed recently - this breaks a lot of MinGW cross build scripts
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B2636E4 AT IRSMSX103 DOT ger DOT corp DOT intel DOT com> <a53282b6-d00c-aad8-76a6-26b4089a9623 AT redhat DOT com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B26CE47 AT IRSMSX102 DOT ger DOT corp DOT intel DOT com> <59399CC5 DOT 60900 AT tlinx DOT org> <417f84ac-5d9f-dc50-e912-973e90b8a128 AT redhat DOT com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B26F278 AT IRSMSX102 DOT ger DOT corp DOT intel DOT com> <34b26965-34c2-b5f0-a3f2-b2c3df344b08 AT gmail DOT com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B270518 AT IRSMSX102 DOT ger DOT corp DOT intel DOT com> <5313de97-d9bd-d9c9-cb4a-254a3eadcf4a AT redhat DOT com> <dfe98b04-27cf-af72-5e96-7a65460c1e53 AT gmail DOT com>
From:	=?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= <HBBroeker AT t-online DOT de>
Message-ID:	<893c8632-1ddf-720b-7009-7e50c5f1ab0d@t-online.de>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:21:48 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<dfe98b04-27cf-af72-5e96-7a65460c1e53@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Am 10.06.2017 um 15:48 schrieb cyg Simple:

> Uhm, 'wt' and 'wb' came from MS itself.  GNU GCC was adapted to allow it
> and just ignores it on systems that don't need it.

Not really.  Only "wt" is a DOS-/Windows-ism, while "wb" is part of the 
standard library, and has been ever since there has been a standard.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -