X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=DGM34Xsx9jow33rj
	MPDxwbcZC6Z3aWGUeYV4aWDvymTHm9HZNg3ki0anAspCopkmU7G4YbYKYxK3enTt
	jLNdzUaupvsWikAv92IdgZYT7ufEdkyJH/WSJBCfGSgg8/xHn7YH/E4UfUQNG/DX
	CLORPMa0yAFhwbMTTtEZMRshwhM=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=GeRLa9lUSu7TFSJBpcc07Q
	wZBOY=; b=tdDsSupX3DlG/nAeFr3qoWp6C6IViQDz+YHjz/+OzwH9UDI6+dNLY3
	T1YZ3wMJ0fzN/ohCMMbb1t3tULIrQO/IjGLm6NSpzSAeUmr2cMf2/lQMqE7ZEJ8B
	UPT8Mvy4dRivGYVo8e6V49mCL3U3VSFO0KxPxBoamh0L9hFQrNj6E=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Exactly, Hx-languages-length:661, hardship, H*f:sk:76251bb
X-HELO:	mx1.redhat.com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 85A76EEF20
Authentication-Results:	ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 85A76EEF20
Subject:	Re: 64bit lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz - Empty
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<aefa5249-51e8-c320-7614-8354b8890da1 AT gmail DOT com> <7e8b44e4-78e9-f9a8-63c1-0979bcecbb87 AT gmail DOT com> <2b672a97-dc43-492f-48d0-c1fabdb7d56c AT gmail DOT com> <76251bb5-9303-6456-11b4-755032891880 AT gmail DOT com> <4e5dde61-633a-a8c1-d143-affb537f1e0c AT gmail DOT com> <159206dc-84d4-e34b-9be3-3d57d682b68e AT gmail DOT com> <9cda83a9-14b1-b997-4ee4-42cf1a602cce AT gmail DOT com>
From:	Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID:	<2aa7094b-6fbc-c981-c20a-4270c1d173bd@cygwin.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:19:02 -0500
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<9cda83a9-14b1-b997-4ee4-42cf1a602cce@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2017-04-04 12:03, cyg Simple wrote:
> On 4/4/2017 9:04 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> On 04/04/2017 14:43, cyg Simple wrote:
>>>
>>> Exactly but the binary install of lapack should require liblapack-devel
>>> and liblapack0.
>>
>> I disagree. It will not happen for my packages
>
> What's the hardship that causes you to make such a bold statement?  You
> upload the same number of files, the only difference is telling setup
> that the package has dependencies.

It's not a question of hardship, there is simply no need for it.

Marco, you can simply remove lapack from PKG_NAMES in order to hide it 
in setup.

-- 
Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -