X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=n/h
	hK2WS4FxUD1hGokoBG4y+E1vmoRqAz7ky4z+83Udgx9x5E/3qqWdmzJdu4vkUsJR
	pQ2en7NwpIXDd2cUzY7SM3d28XNt4/kcOPzzpIz0JsNenc7VeR/3a3aW2IirfLxi
	NwAlgFes9v+nMPL5kq7+qgqZmlNu4lsRM3blsfGQ=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=fnz6AWWx+
	kovjhEQMTrMXNzCX1w=; b=nJyLTYu5T274KhAMhkyNe81KHcA2jGeQ7JQ6Ht1PT
	dV5qF6K1jdaoUPb6XCWpmgNzC87ebWr9FKDDi99zRNqWtUkxuIk3m1sa9WhlJwY/
	dG8etvsCOyxT4H2yFMSqQmafJQAbcC9hPf7dHkKgip41zOTixKjfPiQ9P9zfTaUp
	AY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=DLL, H*Ad:U*alexey
X-HELO:	mail-wm0-f51.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g0oO5XXeDJE+uwj6b9KFnoEC9q3dFgPlbgICDOKCNRE=; b=KMq4BCBFMMMHoSsINWXivtdN5lCWjcEb4tpQuGBiPUiNqo4yVukx5+BIXFFffS2aWR bUZaOoKZ/6oPOMXvwDBKCcF1n7pAN/w/LMuqa1lijw74DVVp3gkjr5lbI2cwXk/Y7H4Z nBRdXKArPsulrhKuosknj7gITRMAwRaLyOW+YGH8ddfQCvzoxv3fjcCCSlaGtmlRvYMf 9yzEgQMXT/SgWLbWTfkxSi/lYcflu5lFz45yRc24exgC32ADRX0yOZh5ZLo5nBpP/vhQ +cRkO8DWweTLh61fL9HXg3VlmRhxqvfXECZgvw2sJnOM2E5v0zu/EtpUMpKbHXV9F3P0 szZw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AFeK/H1v52wybWB7MmkRwrNqNF/CpAVhRO0q+C3k5dIVjccoOmONV/I+QPNV55LGE3/iaA==
X-Received:	by 10.28.104.6 with SMTP id d6mr1642065wmc.79.1490087021386; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 02:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Alexey Sokolov <alexey+cygwin AT asokolov DOT org>
Subject:	dlclose() vs fork()
Message-ID:	<1504e7ff-dd60-f55f-d00a-0a1ae5d5e034@asokolov.org>
Date:	Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:03:37 +0000
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Hello,
If the same DLL is dlopen()ed several times, dlclose() will actually
unload the DLL only after the same number of calls to dlclose().

This works fine in cygwin, until we add fork().

It looks like in the child process the counters of inherited DLLs are
set to 1, so the first dlclose() unloads it, causing segfault for
subsequent access to the unloaded code.
https://github.com/znc/znc/issues/1385#issuecomment-288014319 has a
working minimal example of this behavior.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -