X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=ceGfe
	udPpQ1mcMODe7xdi8CFz767C1jZY0jNmTgm1xekf0skA4JiUXgCV9MkqomSRw6y/
	Ihx2muvOzgaPlFUB7pCxOP47woXK8rJkiv7sZKG4mKtdMAowxKEIczBVRXLm8C9p
	5lw5Sv9cmB6AMxjlmEIeKMLS6v9tVzzPQRR+kU=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=rOQi8yDxTIN
	zRtEhtO34t74xA44=; b=TBZLVY0VBANUMVA/gl4UosHgBFwaRowqeagMG9GnYRi
	8+9cnU4D5wqdeHPLrFdhfDLSzXkwRHgVqdTIOBUYHSvrlenFdmj4pzUzFCZUbSDn
	CRtOrFA3gWOMQ2dYOf3AskCiEh2gLKFMIu+aPlrwFmFWrFBlTx2ld8waCrz3X32g
	=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=risk, Hx-spam-relays-external:ESMTPA
X-HELO:	vsmx009.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net
From:	Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: dash-0.5.9.1-1
References:	<485AF0C5-7E1B-49AA-BE3E-C3717DA3268B AT solidrocksystems DOT com> <58b811b2 DOT 261d9d0a DOT 7c759 DOT 299d AT mx DOT google DOT com> <db63a27c-a322-7fce-1a94-a1371d387c50 AT gmail DOT com> <acb13acc-28e8-c508-1b55-c88d404f9c1b AT redhat DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 02 Mar 2017 19:28:04 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<acb13acc-28e8-c508-1b55-c88d404f9c1b@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:29:01 -0600")
Message-ID:	<87varrzg7f.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-VADE-STATUS:	LEGIT
X-VADE-SCORE:	0
X-VADE-REASON:	gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeelhedrfedvgdduudehucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuvegfuffvqffogfftpdcuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufhffjgfkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheptegthhhimhcuifhrrghtiicuoefuthhrohhmvghkohesnhgvgihgohdruggvqeenucffohhmrghinhepshhtrhhomhgvkhhordhnvghtnecukfhppeeluddrgeejrdegledruddvieenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpqdhouhhtpdhhvghlohepifgvrhhtrhhuugdpihhnvghtpeeluddrgeejrdegledruddviedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpefuthhrohhmvghkohesnhgvgihgohdruggvpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnsegthihgfihinhdrtghomh

Eric Blake writes:
> To reiterate my answer in different terms:
>
> If you can convince Fedora to switch /bin/sh to dash, then I will
> immediately follow in Cygwin.  Until then, I'm worried that there are
> enough scripts in the wild that use bashisms and will therefore break if
> /bin/sh is not bash, even though that number has reduced somewhat since
> Debian made their switch.  Trying to make Cygwin the guinea pig, instead
> of Fedora, is going about it backwards (you WANT the change to be done
> in a place where there is plenty of manpower to deal with the fallout,
> and Fedora has more manpower than Cygwin).

Ack.

I want to put forward that we should get the postinstall scripts moved
from bash to dash as a first step even then.

> I'm still toying with the idea of doing a test release of both bash and
> dash that flips /bin/sh between them; but I'm still stuck on the problem
> that a user MUST upgrade (or downgrade) both packages in tandem, or else
> risk being left without a /bin/sh at all.  Help would be appreciated in
> figuring out the problem (telling me that "dash is faster than bash" is
> not help, nor is telling me that "portable shell scripts don't care if
> /bin/sh is bash or dash" - I already know those points. What I don't
> know is how many non-portable scripts are out there, so how much
> breakage would I be causing by forcing those non-portable scripts to
> deal with their non-portability, and how to minimize the even-worse
> breakage of an upgrade scenario that leaves no /bin/sh at all).

I'd test that in production.  I don't really need handholding
w.r.t. update and potential downgrade process, so if you'd put the two
packages somewhere into an unofficial repo that would work for me.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Q+, Q and microQ:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -