X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=IpPFnb5/NNuiUVMf
	adLhBeVjXby7LtD5ybYXrlbCPPgDlo40xwlE2vinJt2jEwpefPZCoQ7Ytl9MezYJ
	p1beoqM9eqZr+MymRz7+45mkYl05TCyzx0cbwl8bHZ7lzYZP5e4WmyE/R7eagMsX
	XQ7M6mYfTTQTLUycWF1T94zurQI=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ij9/hU6gD8LwQNuE1dEmVh
	AUChs=; b=Y6w8L1HokX4iW+Koob8TPgZ5nFv/dmnNccLWs5PUJBePVwFfwL2GWF
	zkIwBkcbXqqLbGf5ZDCqIyowYI5YN21AFjoqMGWAolftPkcUIFt2oYLG6oZr+kbe
	OUvakQL2wPwQU7lE1J0lSbg2/Ae8KdNcNX7kSHVUDYAMMfN+jXTCQ=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:86o9xpf, H*MI:sk:86o9xpf, H*f:sk:86o9xpf
X-HELO:	mail-wm0-f42.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SfLcjA09JSrwvaa2ht7Fq0qYxipcAveCdcLy6KfkNxM=; b=ir7c2mpNGMDLP5MAZkwMy2gZ6v8VJL8Ta/3ku4rbfhTcVybScEaKXjHiVsQC41Yr/j YFZDiJtES9t568122vslZDN3V/JcJiczPTep3CwOJwMWhocei7zNsuiI7CvKsOrfcod2 k2EyV3hjOvm0AsKguBfMs/iQZEbEzmXWsQb0N+pNEJb/TGEkzAMZ+Lffszyc/rZ6Y4X+ 3EVlKNp7JCKRCz8Gb0lkH8el7ItBGHW5DTF/DIKNVBF5PZO0+wYwFT1UZa3CJCz19w71 9CdWPlJrq5tz9YdkBFwPX5gMOKnpusR9EWXV7/FSlpIIAKv0olPbJhLG1m0tJWg/xZdI EkYA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AMke39mW6OrVOCUAFfXu3NODWPNK0V/vxPzpdhr4a/xufU2+7ecwaSP1990M6PZjKyCflA==
X-Received:	by 10.28.20.144 with SMTP id 138mr9575123wmu.41.1488122302142; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject:	Re: Updated: hwloc 1.11.6-1
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT 05ed8072-c10a-426f-f925-980872a31a14 AT gmail DOT com> <86tw7h7wmn DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <9edce559-2813-c442-29e5-40154283981a AT gmail DOT com> <86poi5z48t DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <370c1b83-8c55-b0eb-14d0-be5721ec7ff6 AT gmail DOT com> <86o9xpf1b6 DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com>
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<d0548872-2345-e209-c6a6-8d7409f90da1@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:18:15 +0100
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<86o9xpf1b6.fsf@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 26/02/2017 15:56, Andy Moreton wrote:
> On Sun 26 Feb 2017, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
>> On 26/02/2017 10:32, Andy Moreton wrote:
>>> On Sun 26 Feb 2017, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/02/2017 23:07, Andy Moreton wrote:
>>>>> On Sat 25 Feb 2017, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Version 1.11.6-1  of packages
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   hwloc
>>>>>>   libhwloc-devel
>>>>>>   libhwloc5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> are available in the Cygwin distribution:
>>>>>
>>>>> This appears not to contain the hwloc(7) man page, mentioned in
>>>>> lstopo(1). Can this be added ?
>>>>>
>>
>> it is in the libhwloc-devel package
>
> Thanks - I should have read your previous post more carefully. Note that
> lstopo(1) says:
>
>  Note that hwloc(7) provides a detailed explanation of the hwloc system;
>        it should be read before reading this man page
>
> Given this, would it make more sense to package hwloc(7) in hwloc rather
> than hwloc-devel ?
>
>     AndyM
>

next build I will move it.

Regards
Marco



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -