X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=KyKB7NycQHBXsgFO3EYDw9wzU8OIU
	nNhQRw1m0ufPSxYCV1TmPYgRQ3Mn2uGxMAhlzrK9g0sxFWTJp56RWdpPDlWVfgTE
	T7ZlTihng4UXj0evF74LAp6LDat3WX3GAMQ1dFZDh3txiWfVmOE3VD5x5P2Q+/DL
	8Zx70ihsewlhPI=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; s=default; bh=eX6Uaot4u17Zn3GGjVr4XnmBUoU=; b=IDB
	qKr2/I7OdjHuVdrGQSDUwSl9Ifo1H5RU0QGKfCVL+Maoc5vF0ODncTp3a6ymUOzH
	xUJnJR9lxBONiz8oNmMUi4EADh26eAbw/in1E9KypzLclgg49FBbIp9KhA76zdLt
	fjixQJlYvRvr+UwED2xA55IEVcStEoRHRbuJrxJ4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:namprd02, 5x, Hauthentication-results:gmail.com, mingw64*gcc5402
X-HELO:	SNT004-OMC2S30.hotmail.com
From:	Tony Kelman <tony AT kelman DOT net>
To:	JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>, "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-gcc-5.4.0-2 (x86/x86_64)
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:45:01 +0000
Message-ID:	<DM2PR0201MB07991A6F56876CDAA4BC679AA7510@DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References:	<announce DOT 57B25054 DOT 3020401 AT gmail DOT com> <DM2PR0201MB079940970D55C5E9019AA53DA7130 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <57B4EF9D DOT 9030903 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <DM2PR0201MB07990FA162A92324D6BF5B4FA7150 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <57B57F47 DOT 3030100 AT gmail DOT com> <DM2PR0201MB0799E7D985236F0497437D56A7150 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <DM2PR0201MB07995B3B84C1DCE4FECAF11FA7150 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <57B5C44B DOT 4000108 AT gmail DOT com> <DM2PR0201MB0799B8159F1557BE281B0971A7160 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <57B7A5BD DOT 6000600 AT gmail DOT com> <DM2PR0201MB0799599FC1D23C3A8FB6FEF6A7E80 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <DM2PR0201MB07999847654538389BC180BAA75E0 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>,<39ba2d3e-b16e-8d69-d2f0-e6a6e65472ca AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<39ba2d3e-b16e-8d69-d2f0-e6a6e65472ca@gmail.com>
authentication-results:	gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=kelman.net;
x-incomingtopheadermarker:	OriginalChecksum:05AB02B20FECBBFB99CEA71410C295074F8F4298B722BB17C6AE5DEFD4112B82;UpperCasedChecksum:FB54623B1FD3ABC969802659888807F987F66E5B87B04BD6985223F33EC94975;SizeAsReceived:8660;Count:39
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype:	1
x-tmn:	[PQZ0Dhn8VQvydTv0kKtTNTOaIugRqrbK]
x-incomingheadercount:	39
x-eopattributedmessage:	0
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics:	1;CO1NAM04HT067;7:w9Q4b2LiUQTFgpwsUElWnOuHwRtTqdGK5mvwR4yEmF0CQYtyPm5g4G+3tGOQoYJ41lR2OnlZ0PiRhr0BxsutKXjm2kVqQWLPWMX7tGUwZanRh/b7MjRFxBf2mWNFpubZ9XxBVLJCv67tzbdRuQ+YegaNY3UucZ0CY9+TsiRq6YN8nSgbyQlz/RW9kov1SdUgSMh7zazxiSgJ0v9MxHIOMP3T7ff1CeQQLunXQ+fTDNGxk7uCLvKbEiNNQR2/Had6BQKO907vDJnAoNWLtsWFhVEr7nNCVex3JDg5nh09uCBmDi3vOlDTNn5q6flHn4cgQLijSweqbtdaJffx1eTRcw==
x-forefront-antispam-report:	EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(98900012);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:CO1NAM04HT067;H:DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id:	39d7af4a-a909-4006-2931-08d45a683711
x-microsoft-antispam:	UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506556)(5061507331)(1603103135)(1601125237)(1603101373)(1701031045);SRVR:CO1NAM04HT067;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test:	BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(432015087)(444000031);SRVR:CO1NAM04HT067;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1NAM04HT067;
x-forefront-prvs:	0225B0D5BC
spamdiagnosticoutput:	1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata:	NSPM
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-OriginatorOrg:	outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime:	21 Feb 2017 14:45:01.2031 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader:	Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id:	84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped:	CO1NAM04HT067
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v1LEjWUo006961

> Do you have a small test case for this instead of running the entire
> test suite? I'm not sure how much time the full test suite takes.

Don't have a small test case, but I do have a big one. I've been
verifying that the patch helps in cross-compiles from opensuse
where it's a lot faster to build a patched gcc (and the test case)
than in cygwin.

Large test case (takes about 15 minutes on my year-old laptop):

curl -L http://llvm.org/releases/3.7.1/llvm-3.7.1.src.tar.xz | tar -xJf -
mkdir -p llvmbuild/bin
cd llvmbuild
echo 'set(CMAKE_C_COMPILER gcc)' > NATIVE.cmake
echo 'set(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER g++)' >> NATIVE.cmake
cp /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/*.dll bin
cmake ../llvm-3.7.1.src -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=Windows \
  -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=host \
  -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=i686-w64-mingw32-gcc \
  -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=i686-w64-mingw32-g++ \
  -DCROSS_TOOLCHAIN_FLAGS_NATIVE=-DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=$PWD/NATIVE.cmake
make -j`nproc` opt
bin/opt.exe -slp-vectorizer \
  -S ../llvm-3.7.1.src/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/vector.ll


That'll give the following sane LLVM IR output on gcc 4.9, or crash on
unpatched 5+.

; ModuleID = '../llvm-3.7.1.src/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/vector.ll'
target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.8.0"

define void @test(<4 x i32> %in, <4 x i32> %in2) {
  %k = icmp eq <4 x i32> %in, %in2
  ret void
}


> I'll to include the update in the next 5.x release.

Thanks! We're mainly trying to double-check that the patch doesn't
introduce any regressions, cause more problems than it solves.

-Tony

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -