X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=WxH
	x9LfOPUQiC550dhGI3uU50HhdQxT5Pyirze8JzoWwTAUzFiIvZYgEn6BXY+dvZQM
	GUCJ+sNGNmHcc0QN/mP87DCTtJ+JOi38GxlJ7WLxI/xstSvUEy68m1bIasNTePU0
	D0rvF8F+PdxzkXGid2RrAwqipCQ9AV/MPlEFx9WM=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=gYH3bW8hU
	iFttPIhbQhDSPQrsmw=; b=m0NQa10suewn6WRmPteVrubOZa5aGYFR4USYzgXvz
	Ddpe6b3EqEjSB494Fo4WstS2k5twCJo/RIm9RPcq/X9iEDVArvgBoNaa6EIUMA3y
	+4WmOBD6MaUxjjjlfX1y7TFwq/4dgbkO12dawJmFF9/tVNpy/4BchTMO5ZSbbLyx
	yQ=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=announcement, hasn't, H*r:192.168.3, hasnt
X-HELO:	Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org
Message-ID:	<58239ADA.6060603@tlinx.org>
Date:	Wed, 09 Nov 2016 13:53:30 -0800
From:	"L. A. Walsh" <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	isn't or hasn't 32 bit support going or gone away?
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

I thought I remember an announcement about 32-bit support
going away in cygwin and that cygwin would only be built for
64-bit?  Am I imagining this or was this reversed?

Thanks...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -