X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=UwLaALDV8DCVc092RC
	LF1AJo2x91JXuVgTKyUXxTPxQlpzLfBYL1Q8F2uC8uDxJdSz4jXFSLvtiv1xVktp
	v1Cvhsce0Ik0D9Krm+STjS7tt3ki+dQv7CUbNwnjluW+VEHXi8ixQ4hfDkraD0Zq
	+MH3Y4G0HzzfUycC/rcY/bnpg=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:mime-version; s=default; bh=J0u/mjYGXzQfG0DpYjKuuVWX
	Sds=; b=M1yF+2pBlhzdvm42ozUBfOzpY+Tkqpf9rJE0p/m2sd3Peb/6kgFWsHJg
	95wVMADTTaBixwefBC/eK3vWifduxuOszNxWHhW9lHsQSRkjqdVtzHG8U4YbkCe8
	A83veKtmekyhYFSjGciz9WjIdZ2AjODPCwQ4dcuwWIrVwbfvccY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:40db60e, H*f:sk:40db60e, HImportance:Normal
X-HELO:	mailout.ish.de
X-Abuse-ID:	hremUFXL0y-8240 AT umkbw DOT customer
Anomaly-Results:	submit.unitybox.de; rate=0%
Dubio-Filter:	Adamant Filter v2016.04.1 submit.unitybox.de 3s7z3N5KPkz7t9S
From:	Helmut Karlowski <helmut DOT karlowski AT ish DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: PATHEXT is fundamental to Windows and Should be recognised by CYGWIN
In-Reply-To:	<40db60e7-cc96-d925-1d98-0a80be134d39@gmail.com>
References:	<CACoZoo3_kBe6zWktTzydhHFzeZMr+AZe1Z2WujagTcLme_ctZg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <40db60e7-cc96-d925-1d98-0a80be134d39 AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2016 17:39:12 +0200
Message-Id:	<20160809173912.78BF9E40.helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

---------------------------------------------------
> file.  I'm not satisfied that we should continue with the .exe
> artificial symlink for the same reasons we shouldn't use PATHEXT.
> Because of the amount of time to port scripts and software to use the
> .exe suffix for executable files it should be an optional configuration
> that is on by default with a scheduled deadline (two or three years) to
> make it off by default.

Basically I'd agree. In this case any cygwin-prg that should be 
executable by windows would need a symlink to the .exe-version.

Or hook into windows' findfirst/findnext ;)
Would PATHEXT=%PATHEXT%;. be a good idea?

-Helmut


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -