X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=IBAuQcGARwvd5Asq
	nLYIsLHlHgFleyCGGQAUTuFfGxRN9gXnVDYIIGIPA2l3YvhThSJ4gUW/u3lFSBSZ
	yAfjrlEwOJPX/azQON8lePey03a65Ashn/EL1b6u6JXNyK7LlGQnagiQFvmUKNPF
	llUMIqGed8J7rJRTkNHDy3AlkmE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=fK0EYbkFcnT2vWG3MZuj10
	Ov/w0=; b=f9olrluGgUkcuF1rWEt2tF6mWKjmkucBr6jhvCtW4DkTZ8rivf1dUG
	5JBniloTUDs0lKG2yF6FKvEkpEL7M8Q+vxioT4D5/FSFDHYhI91YEd/kUOyeZ5AD
	2AHwEU/ohMPH2P0xtnFCDtN1z9xz5mf2pKaguKTM7a2moHYw6JDGA=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Rosin, rosin, H*i:sk:d9a1d5a, H*f:sk:d9a1d5a
X-HELO:	mail-wm0-f49.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U97sFnjRsbJfAuQcyjNvTVpSpdzeBQsBbsVqbqRq+Ag=; b=fu9vrEzDbGtIXfX+ZU/ZM/HDgRW/A8KmE5T+Ft4cL27rXp+M/NWWRcDf77ps9++N8M 01pk0I1wHIS5/ZBYGH4tE6mUfKx3n9ZCqFtC3vqRny6yAOxu5nittZ1viD0byKnG+xC6 vH2yfZbqpCPiuibuBfhtsFZDnqDkxYCQr2IxsUY63DThFsiojT0iKWhNMZ9EFsLR/kNx /znBMhNfSPTOYEoUBS5TVWV8GNqygu/tDoWPTUp90wlZhXG+6zrihIuUYp0XHOnbpT1o rF6VRjozsoDr3OIoAQGpQ4emwqy4j7mV6KbgRCeSPA3L5gNxyp1gheM9RLT5kAzlJVeB vvqA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AEkooustARattVBmG+DogIFsXXF8hQf13vSqCCU2JpiTnpRnkbYj3Ib1+4LqNH9gLi+E/A==
X-Received:	by 10.194.186.231 with SMTP id fn7mr41847218wjc.164.1469852621149; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 21:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: Autoconf fooled by AC_FC_LINE_LENGTH
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<8fa2a8a5-fb86-02c9-5cd0-521a9680abe3 AT gmail DOT com> <d9a1d5a2-f477-c14a-db23-bfa9334308fa AT lysator DOT liu DOT se>
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<f99e8aa5-c077-f60b-3e19-bd9c6f2fb242@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 30 Jul 2016 06:23:36 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<d9a1d5a2-f477-c14a-db23-bfa9334308fa@lysator.liu.se>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 29/07/2016 21:32, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2016-07-29 14:23, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> building latest Arpack
>> https://github.com/opencollab/arpack-ng/releases
>> https://github.com/opencollab/arpack-ng/issues/41
>>
>> I hit a strange case where the presence of a single line
>>
>> AC_FC_LINE_LENGTH(unlimited)
>>
>> before the usual
>> LT_PREREQ([2.4.2])
>> LT_INIT([win32-dll])
>>
>> is causing the libtool to be incorrectly set, versus
>> the right case

>>
>> It seems libtool is incorrectly set for MSVC platform
>>
>> I tried to move the libtool inizialization before the
>> AC_FC_LINE_LENGTH but autoconf is objecting on wrong preference.
>>
>> It seems a bug impacting only cygwin.
>
> Reading the source comment for AC_FC_LINE_LENGTH indicates that
> you should call AC_FC_FREEFORM or AC_FC_FIXEDFORM before you call
> AC_FC_LINE_LENGTH. You do not do that. This is not mentioned in
> the autoconf manual I'm looking at. I don't know if the source
> code comment or the manual is correct (it's been 20 years since I
> last used fortran...)

Hi Peter,
thanks for the hint, unfortunately it makes no difference.

Looking at the upstream code I notice
that AC_FC_LINE_LENGTH is the only FC call
while all the rest is F77 based

$ grep _FC configure.ac
   AC_FC_LINE_LENGTH(unlimited)

$ grep _F77 configure.ac
AC_PROG_F77
AC_F77_FUNC(sgemm$SYMBOLSUFFIX, sgemmsuff)
AC_F77_FUNC(snaupd$SYMBOLSUFFIX, snaupdsuff)
AC_F77_FUNC(sneupd$SYMBOLSUFFIX, sneupdsuff)
AC_F77_FUNC(dnaupd$SYMBOLSUFFIX, dnaupdsuff)
AC_F77_FUNC(dneupd$SYMBOLSUFFIX, dneupdsuff)
AC_F77_FUNC(cheev$SYMBOLSUFFIX, cheevsuff)

and this is fishy.
I need to check it

>
> However, I suspect the issue is that libtool might eat or be
> otherwise confused by the flag selected to get fortran support
> for long lines. What is FCFLAGS when you have the macro present?
>
> Out on a limb here...
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> PS. some logs would be handy...

which one ? Autoconf and configure are a bit verbose

Regards
Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -