X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=QKzF5+Tt3tUyhfKF
	MPD0L23XeO4Sj3Sc+pEURviFUv50HkswjYnuw9G7jtoD2UI9cKxSlJ2M+5Wdu9+R
	AeqQjrptLG30xVEF7Wz2yQ6FCEZvdTFtQe4ZUOj/JxQTl9M0YzLsVff4MUH5sHFZ
	UDnYeoj6ZSSlEiEZ70yYZP7XGkI=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=2rigWG/Y43/xEpMbx35gov
	B5D3U=; b=QMhsUgTOvWHt1MSNE/Ew5+M8E3xfWJzUjGA9NTdisslPUmWuV+1DGJ
	YU8JaWYeAw5wqZGnJOVodO1+VHIgF3nlOhHylSaniu3mO9Te8i2si3mYeddtFS5a
	ty1P0zQDvCTX1udyWPxTvQx1HQJNS4a6+4Qi9ekliW04QTO8A02WE=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=enright, Enright, bypass, Cleartype
X-HELO:	mout.kundenserver.de
Subject:	Re: Mintty 2.4.0 and Deja Vu Sans Mono 2.35: issue with bold
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<f5bfurgc8hn DOT fsf AT troutbeck DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <57840508 DOT 4080308 AT towo DOT net> <f5b37neao66 DOT fsf AT troutbeck DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <FD39AB8C-C64B-4880-8B1D-8FE43723A9E0 AT etr-usa DOT com> <57854454 DOT 2090305 AT towo DOT net> <CAOC2fq9GKYCasehtNsQgPO_9Y-Ln6y7CM4n5cevxdY2eDFYYKw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <92f7d6c0-8449-def3-0d6c-5af7799d06ff AT towo DOT net>
From:	Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net>
Message-ID:	<578696E8.80409@towo.net>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:30:48 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<92f7d6c0-8449-def3-0d6c-5af7799d06ff@towo.net>
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V01:K0:hxzovGXyxhs=:D2ajkx/lhZn0uBUO5esc/O es0Pm/TK63oTprtXM/d6CcS/IyDWJFeQc5bMEmkJkbYVgtRxQ+6L0MU/8/GLJdXB07EqGh3Ab SWum0SGdy7qUwhiC/bpVCiIa7SjdPYRaMUUAEPdevPTOqb4g+5EieCvvvdZ5ruod2t6KwNdWm OGOY5iTgBU93CWjEHByqYTGSVublnuCzls3Cc5v9LsHz8ZGEcdwMuYaQTjpsSFNxJSqCZG+Zx frR7z4yBxeuNTSaN7eLn4x4WzmhcecRL3cMHeYeFLPaZuHCx3itFKcOjDyzyjd814TMOMd0Ce Rt+pXJi4+qkBwH5yz/cPTaVlWIpmpfA6PmUnK3EnsRo3iyFYZ2mwVmLjYHLuvkS2DU9JHcwy2 8BkWKoJ8HLucbyuKUAmOsSl54Llgk7IpiAz0cl8006qGaEGawIP8hNSfuvmAeodODoF91HeSv oUd1+sRXHsHAAmXiRmF1QbKSIDmrPOiRzEx6dHB4/ksM+KqW3gq5uWFNgOTM9yY99gJl0ayHd AN30oafbJxqlg+cCsdPU4sg2/OnC5Fn2ndpYnycjBzJH5cOtgQIN5QqFeVhMAt1VX7Beypuhu XV1L23WYQcB0gDF4mrXLpqPpl8pIkwRHcHV1MqANkMPUEswgZFmSGt9aPYG5BAoYrt6zehGo4 /9pj+l5/wQLDfkq9g8O+G1+qBKd2R3CnotH48ROp1rw+zq13tSMHbvF9v+NOScvgCuU3BPtkv NLo9KqcQH0I0bRO8
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Am 13.07.2016 um 07:56 schrieb Thomas Wolff:
> Am 12.07.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Michael Enright:
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>>> Mintty generates "faux-bold" by overstriking with a pixel offset of 
>>> 1. Maybe
>>> it should scale the thickness with the font size (like it does now for
>>> manual underline and VT100 line drawing graphics), at increased risk of
>>> clipping, however.
>>>
>>> Suggestions welcome.
>>> Thomas
>> I assume you have already tried quite a few suggestions. Did you try
>> digitally inflating the bitmap image of the normal weight characters?
> No; apart from how to find a suitable algorithm, this would bypass the
> system font rendering, including smoothing/Cleartype, so likely not have
> good results.
>
>> Did you try using the metrics from the normal weight while rendering
>> with the bold weight?
> The bold font is requested to be created with the same metrics ...
Actually, it isn't. Found the root cause.
Thomas

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -