X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=nvZOnKWaaIcl4Wli
	nnlYvebaV1U4ykgp7da2/ZYhouw7m5HZAkVSV1+D5rflk5BKxWSxS437WHHcusRf
	LE5G7VKoMUtydlPxkbIPsBzLwl+bNxK+SSws9OZFCl3McO9mTAYndSeFlAOOCDwx
	ojDuFPcxd/fua82eul4v7tUbiK4=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=CC7VYiAauzI6LXXg2TYjUA
	QLIPo=; b=fhMvE/64o/a1RnllCxwHhkHEa7Cr931lXZFDmrKKJTMnAUkUF8c2xo
	pVIqS3x0jIe2xzELC/uU8o4sAxI5Jg8CMV7jKp70pGDZYR8mPKNkYIkbReD4qWjP
	G5t74O+CvT1ECdjiZpJwaQ9OFq+ww8yxKHgYBwAOjs9H7c7aKq6QU=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1051, ADVICE
X-HELO:	mail-wm0-f41.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fxAEOc1PDFLlvKkAgs8U6KYRBixSLCVcvwh/u+Dr4dY=; b=LrFKy+ClgZjpcT+DgKDGnT4+CQJYTBXbbZDPhqlME972yxgN89Kh4xFEhUjUYSSNFO fnxotwbtFgAN2DPFSVB0nG4dj9jgZIkFlQ15+uo/XZabdTcgQX7wHItanl7WPrw94xPX EnURVWEmZNz1AwHGx8Q6FpsWhmDPNqaj5AUUy8KARpo+Ih5P01gsUiqnYS+9BgDS39Az jdCIm2cobPZNhIwlJTjyQaJrrJehARr0gkUY5Byzm8hFErIjH0AX7gYdninUcuDyK5+u GwIU7z2rYCg4hgxe8yUqLNXxkAwgAqkoDQHiPGovcXRjKG1gZlGlKvi/eC6GCOSBzXHi Fr0g==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALyK8tJqdD6pJYreF5XwrXEN8KRMQjg8asmGTI0XNsMSon+IiZWEZIo881h/pZGFkuBLhQ==
X-Received:	by 10.194.149.176 with SMTP id ub16mr1229647wjb.107.1468265717438; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: CVS version 32 vs 64-bit
To:	Vince Rice <vrice AT solidrocksystems DOT com>
References:	<660AE976-EFA6-44C0-8EB9-BDCBEF93FD9B AT solidrocksystems DOT com> <a4dc5869-9956-239c-5c6b-399cc37f0434 AT gmail DOT com> <40C15EC2-DD22-4804-9FF1-BCBD9947FA89 AT solidrocksystems DOT com>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<8ef7706a-28ce-2875-67fb-cad773ba18d0@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:35:06 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<40C15EC2-DD22-4804-9FF1-BCBD9947FA89@solidrocksystems.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 11/07/2016 21:24, Vince Rice wrote:
>> On Jul 11, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com
>> <mailto:marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/07/2016 18:40, Vince Rice wrote:
>>> Is there a reason there’s a different version of cvs in 32-bit vs
>>> 64-bit Cygwin?
>>>
>>> 32-bit shows 1.12.13-10.
>>> 64-bit shows 1.11.23.
>>>
>>> (Yes, I know, git forever, but not everyone got the memo.)
>>> --
>>
>> https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-07/msg00054.html
>>
>> 1.11.23-2 is the last version for both arch
>>
>> Regards
>> Marco
>
> Hmmm. Then I wonder how this is true.
>

The available one from setup are

	cvs-1.11.22-1
	cvs-1.11.23-2	

https://cygwin.com/packages/x86/cvs/

As I wrote in the ADVICE the upgrade
from 1.12.13-10 to cvs-1.11.23-2 can only
be managed manually, as setup is considering the
1.12.13-10 version higher than 1.11.23-2.
This unusual upgrade is not managed by the current logic in setup.
It was in the past but it created other upgrade problems.

Regards
Marco








--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -