X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=gV7vZvzIsLz7nnnR
	N5V3TBXAJuqGreDyV/S3Vc1Z+zUkS7786dtbIKxJ6VYDaBOo6hCTrOsqiXlbgYau
	TvCv8u1+iuQWyKvb7iecmfqFhjk2aRtEnaIdRV/JzKzEg0GNP92i0jeCZGuIEXTZ
	fg6RbHlulUnNhmCzm7SLCRhDM2o=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=7uplMVQGaeifqlx6uAGe+A
	EFaws=; b=mdy940uBrSuPtqdVydZVp1zf83ka66fdFPvo0vzg6pEnD1+HRgJIOX
	DpfkFd8/2e0nL6+cfkwecDD5eDYAiyTbukGag6xyoF+XfEkiOE6Q1tMemz338YCH
	GVAi/0phGdKE0QiVxf0oBedAj2xoOgXmI0r33DbbatXxXMqtUP5yM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Win10, win10, H*u:FreeBSD, H*UA:FreeBSD
X-HELO:	glup.org
Authentication-Results:	glup.org; dmarc=none header.from=glup.org
Subject:	Re: Vim responds too slow on the latest snapshot of cygwin1.dll
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20160606003303 DOT ecd888597a40bd1081308452 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20160606084328 DOT GD14744 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20160606200532 DOT c8f2353c277a1957095e69a5 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <CAGHJv4d50OKraNLhF4eicJVR9XQ+_cYizXEiHO=wr8v-aK9k1w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160606145242 DOT GB4919 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
From:	John Hood <cgull AT glup DOT org>
Message-ID:	<2345c1b0-1a18-f445-2d45-4c29ac4e9055@glup.org>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jun 2016 21:21:33 -0400
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20160606145242.GB4919@calimero.vinschen.de>

It has taken way too long to get a usable Win7 VM set up, but I can
confirm that the 2.5.2.0.1 snapshot works well on Win7 with my test
programs and fixes the issues noted in Corinna's commits, and is
somewhat faster than 2.5.1.  The snapshot's issues with Win7 were also
worse than others have reported, I saw select() locking up and not
responding to either timeout or events.  Definitely something that
should not have reached a release.

I'll apologize for the bugs, they're clearly regressions from what I had
done.  I think I introduced bugs when I reworked the commits to
eliminate changes to cygwait.h, and didn't test sufficiently (I'd
migrated both my Win7 machines to Win10).

regards,

  --jh

On 06/06/2016 10:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun  6 09:50, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> On 6 June 2016 at 07:05, Takashi Yano wrote:
>>>> Just as John I can't reproduce this.  What OS version do you run this
>>>> on, and is it 32, 32 under WOW64, or 64 bit?
>>> OS: Windows 7 (64bit)
>>> Cygwin: Both 32bit and 64bit
>>>
>>> I have tested on two Win7 machines, and the problem
>>> occurs on both machines.
>>>
>>> Further, this problem occurs in Windows 7, but does
>>> not occur in Windows 10, as far as I tested.
>>>
>>> Can you possibly test on Win7 machine?
>> I can confirm that I see this behaviour on 64bit Windows 7 running
>> 64bit Cygwin using the newly released snapshot (06/06/16).  If there
>> is anything I can do to assist with debugging the issue please let me
>> know.
> Thanks for the offer.  I could actually reproduce it on a W7 32 bit
> machine.  I found the problem and fixed it.  While I was at it, I
> improved the timer handling in select_stuff::wait a bit.
>
> What I'd *really* need now is people testing the latest snapshot on
> https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ ASAP and throw at it what they can think
> of.  Is there still a regression compared to 2.5.1?  If so, please
> report.
>
>
> Thanks to all of you,
> Corinna
>


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -