X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=fFXvGBNYBB1mWzeh
	JyPb2r7qek2B5oiEvpbDgL9GjaqcWQvMsQdyyEgoE/OOCBr0f+sumPVzcR8gGQ5B
	nfBuUfF3pBuv+cA83LvtinbwXXBYAqIUKsweK5kFabfg4xr8iYt/gA/icAKMLrj3
	STEEYgv6yQQIw1FiTwgF3JZdpoE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ZeCDogyRAOEb3Zqlh1KYwz
	v32pM=; b=DWP3HIdgJeSOWFnRKEKLSCanJSOYELaauMc+0MgMVHlnj8BVsY10zL
	qgulb7ffDPaUoq44nY8GeMH6YKCwzL//0MhIt95+X1EPKg+x57O9vDypU2+UqqTR
	Y4qjRTod5vJLVzJrAm+hts5jnGMYQlVPWfAUjqj3Xa+VImgTUhPgo=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-HELO:sk:smtp-ou, Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:smtp-ou, H*RU:sk:smtp-ou, H*Ad:D*co.uk
X-HELO:	smtp-out-3.tiscali.co.uk
Subject:	Re: Necessity for the assignment form
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<o8xeg8x7e2r DOT wl-koba AT jp DOT fujitsu DOT com>
From:	David Stacey <drstacey AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk>
Message-ID:	<8af86ed5-e1cd-77f4-335b-d192ef3dfe6e@tiscali.co.uk>
Date:	Fri, 20 May 2016 06:46:00 +0100
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<o8xeg8x7e2r.wl-koba@jp.fujitsu.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4wfKukQbta7g182SxINPT7iUu/i5EIZYszxvVhUNa3yEnKACn4wjbimnM01zmHUGG5ZbzlpWKnBhve7sa7cobtko001P5u8f9bg4McDIEJAPLn1BmkRi/N wJCmjPWIfMNx3anZFLvEDaZZDwjuryAAEX/oAfA3oi7ChNDoN1YDMzZ6
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 20/05/16 01:44, KOBAYASHI Shinji wrote:
> I found a bug and I am willing to submit a patch (under
> winsup/cygwin). But before doing that, I was asked from my employer to
> clarify some points.https://cygwin.com/contrib.html  says that the
> assignment form is required "if your change is going to be a
> significant one in terms of the size of your code changes". So the
> questions are:
>
> 1. Who is going to determine if the change is "a significant one"?
> 2. In fact, my patch is just two lines of modifications, so I believe
>     that it is not "a significant one". Is it okay to send such a small
>     patch without the assignment form?


For Cygwin, the boundary between trivial and substantial is usually 
taken as ten lines. A two-line patch would probably be accepted without 
an assignment form.

Dave.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -