X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=WNf+2FXyv2Da2xlo
	KgDd5+izniOwJuoWWvBFOhYfnhWKehvRd+isjnzjQZUkHHequxDNZw6fCxbE9tY6
	L9xPpPOKCCHLkx3wf1rYgfOCh0TJtQbBr8hXU5XdEwYuYZUts9MPfNfCEntb6GFI
	r0eHjZ7l8cQ7JBn4AmPjcl9wqxY=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=5/HPUCn8YGEomYIi1nqkg9
	5oJQg=; b=dkUi4bGRXlhknXw9EfCoP4X9bwWABimHzwE04dcV8vTLU64tqxI58s
	/SpCxl226435L0Rqtl/DM4kE6y4OcPYVQS+amUR3yK4oLxKNwP4eA3fpHKPnhjHc
	m0xk2KczG+jbMaFaG1upfIj+yXp+FWq5yXs/7buxfd7Io+N6dMrtE=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Bonnet, bonnet, borrow, 0992
X-HELO:	mx1.redhat.com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] clamav 0.99.1-1
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT 201603301732 DOT u2UHW4eN011967 AT int-mx11 DOT intmail DOT prod DOT int DOT phx2 DOT redhat DOT com> <6da62132-1e66-41c9-043d-c552f4faf1c3 AT redhat DOT com> <4f86f77b-e2cb-b654-760b-499623dd61a1 AT cygwin DOT com>
From:	Mike Bonnet <mikeb AT redhat DOT com>
Message-ID:	<360d98a0-8e44-e816-ea44-d87a2e2655a4@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 May 2016 09:10:54 -0700
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4f86f77b-e2cb-b654-760b-499623dd61a1@cygwin.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 5/11/16 8:18 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-05-11 09:35, Mike Bonnet wrote:
>> I'm seeing segfaults with this version when recursively scanning large
>> directories. Running Cygwin x86_64 on Windows Server 2012.
>
> But not with 0.99?  Have you been able to reproduce this on any other
> systems?

Only saw it with 0.99.1. Yes, saw it on several systems, all running 0.99.1.

>> In the past
>
> When?

This was several years ago.

>> this happened when some 32-bit files were in the source tree
>> when the 64-bit version was built. It's possible this happened again.
>
> Extremely unlikely.  cygport makes 32-bit and 64-bit builds in their own
> directories.
>
>> Any chance we could get a new 64-bit build?
>
> We'd need to find the real cause of this before it would be of any help.
>  I'd start with updating to 0.99.2, however we borrow Fedora's -norar
> sources but they haven't bumped yet (#1333949).

I'll retry with 0.99.2 when it's available.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -