X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=yzCxrSKRWTRKqF6f
	QWBEFNstHqmvu1xoApNjExTbPOapWVHj5ZQ7bbqO8vsVPG3e2tLmeHtKC95mSfKD
	nnvp/zZn5q3kbwrXmrvBJtp3XvQX8TY5SnAFTzWxmLmo2hSKP7Pq3L0UHxX+xCOQ
	buhhiGHlDaKPqUx8JaJ0CkZey/4=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=3axOrCHVtvN9mGJmnNYzEE
	XoChI=; b=PZHW03sxI39MHzn9LUDDKKF3Lo0d4PCLDR8apKudvReJjv7sRcIqnV
	ESb9RIt79NVoTuNvM9meSY3tWjgc78R9W+34n5wQFDLSQz8QLtZw2Vx5sB5F41xp
	vEGVHIJMb5PFANqaojF7/Sg7Ek2uQ0/9nVIEjZjCLtAIH7lo/Kh6E=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:D*se, H*MI:sk:WsX-A AT m, H*i:sk:WsX-A AT m, H*f:sk:WsX-A AT m
X-HELO:	mail.lysator.liu.se
Subject:	Re: `CYGWIN=winsymlinks:nativestrict`, `ln -s target link` fails if target doesn't exist
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAPTiy3NUXprQL6V0+Njc2L7XfhpqtC7oWFwNMhOEFZ2OZmddoQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1606116423 DOT 20160429020650 AT yandex DOT ru> <CAPTiy3OhkvWhGKCisnoLBFZqTL1_Rcq4-vdn0U8Qfnxk+WsX-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	Peter Rosin <peda AT lysator DOT liu DOT se>
Message-ID:	<5580e7fc-e227-d9d8-a186-b58c8b17cfa3@lysator.liu.se>
Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:02:58 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAPTiy3OhkvWhGKCisnoLBFZqTL1_Rcq4-vdn0U8Qfnxk+WsX-A@mail.gmail.com>

On 2016-04-29 13:34, Gene Pavlovsky wrote:
>>> POSIX says a symlink to a missing target is perfectly well-defined (you
>>> can't stat() through it, but you can readlink() it). But Windows native
>>> symlinks can't do that.  So the problems you are encountering all stem
>>> from the fact that you are trying to make Windows do something it can't.
>>
>> My initial reaction was that, too, but I tried mklink (CMD internal command)
>>
>>> mklink x y
>>
>> and it created the symlink in the empty directory just fine.
> 
> This is my point exactly. Windows dangling symlinks can be created as
> easily as in UNIX.
> At least this is the case on my Win7 x64.

No, it can't.

c:\>mklink a b
c:\>mkdir b
c:\>cd b
c:\b>cd ..
c:\>cd a
The directory name is invalid
c:\>rmdir b
c:\>echo hello > b
c:\>type a
hello

It only works for dangling links to files. Not good enough.

Cheers,
Peter

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -