X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Ex5hiNjlD6Qr7puV
	Irtk7Wti/4hWkO78PQL4sLPkCZO8g6AfRu+7mVjw6TT6lOxZcvvqRRiRdEbedd2j
	pLx5pVyRJ4ibh990DCdCq8hjifhdW8TxwwiEsie8Xz4jVGDCyixjFTUjhCtk+F1V
	V69tXh3isS8MDnbjbGnS2H6G6l0=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=aw0tKV1jrj38+D0dFP6D6X
	d5Kv4=; b=fUFYzaM/X2/gZt3VgTkCShk8oEd8DLc5gHUAzxAr+U2OemwDEFJ19n
	po0ZdrJTdRZKUVmvn0YD4zKNLG5a8JDIcFJl5MtJPG9bbIfnWrjLI/Yt474doNFD
	56di/CX/+5bCMexPQ+gATNLmdxQiNRfMejMmlUIqDs197AmrCmQlQ=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Console, H*UA:38.2.0, H*r:212.227.17, H*r:sk:mout.ku
X-HELO:	mout.kundenserver.de
Subject:	Re: Mintty font problem
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<014uDkmQD5520S08 DOT 1460378583 AT web08 DOT cms DOT usa DOT net> <570C0BC0 DOT 6070205 AT towo DOT net> <570D5A16 DOT 7050303 AT towo DOT net>
From:	Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net>
Message-ID:	<571FBF27.9070906@towo.net>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:19:03 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<570D5A16.7050303@towo.net>
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V01:K0:VD2zgMLK6NM=:KDChAuudC8d+ByHOJGeEH1 4W2n+ch1PvH4T6BmCOk3yVmM1AcnbhE/lF3Zo7ky9AJ359PwHf3azwWIlpeLSZ2KWfaRWjOPF ffrljHDalJw1xWes1okQmktweG1ylu4JY+3sQanO8vwlpG6OteksGao+FlkP3YfuH8lYKYatd hKJ3i4YLKNEyjleJe3bj9VzTRkAB3vf+YUhmm9ILZ0AUGA0t6SuaBrArzDVTIPfmSPXQpQn/2 X3SaRkeUnJ15OvoHoRl9FfaPwdJ64Aqst7RFUixOoVeEa54mi2QFtkU6UpntYW54Lh5utC4HD EuI6x+xDl8owFviSKM47jm8SpwKkcWdGWVRrNuGihhsJIO3ovuwOfVGn2gsK0VKtqnIbq5bU3 u03Zz26WZgfDufkKX31iJtt8FAJMyWccYrYNbKsGVUSadDLtttiVxKy7nWxMZHkPYP18IAx/4 hDAJIJJvBw4Q39LmzePzxDFO2AV/QJE2tIwbi35Ny5YticM6L90Tcok62XKKLaEM8R3LEs185 bzW5EkfJLsn5BXGoI4yvdm3p9lCSF/U9vciDbXVW8q5ozqIz8NFdXntPy1u0TTtK0SPQa2mYE 5pfyL85QKiLRbc7ZcX3cNSkyX4UiULV6UP9bjoB6G5XcHhwc6Q/Na0F+cnnVBBIGMnWfVD/Bw d6E0towRnt7cKjTvouuCVR5XyfvrYu59BBTZudJ9eNW96A+stiSKPB0X/iCpv4Ix78iM5lodl Sgbka8jv2eewA38I
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Am 12.04.2016 um 22:27 schrieb Thomas Wolff:
> Am 11.04.2016 um 22:40 schrieb Thomas Wolff:
>> Am 11.04.2016 um 14:43 schrieb KARL BOTTS:
>>>
>>> Perhaps related to font issues in mintty: In .minttyrc is a new 
>>> property
>>> FontWeight=700,
>> which means you had configured the bold version of the font.
>>> after I installed Cygwin 2.4.1-1 and mintty 2.3.5. (I noticed,
>>> only because I have home dir files in revision control.)  I too use 
>>> Lucida Console.
>>>   With the 700, the font looked visibly "skinny" to me.
>> actually, rather the normal, non-bold font. The new font weight 
>> adjustment apparently enforces that although you selected bold 
>> (unless an even bolder weight would exist in the font family).
>> Maybe the font selection should be tweaked to allow selecting a bold 
>> font even at the cost of not having a bolder variant available.
> Actually, it does allow that, as can be seen with some other fonts. 
> The issue with Lucida Console is that it does not have a bold weight, 
> so there is only the Normal (400) weight which is then selected by the 
> new font weight tweaking algorithm.
>
>>> I set it to 800, looks fine now.  No problem, just tinkering required.
> This is obviously inconsistent with the behaviour of mapping 700 to 
> Normal.
This has been tweaked in the repository.
Thomas

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -