delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2016/04/20/10:40:50

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
default; b=qFr6/+j2RkzUjbllz4EHPjlte/gonW39J5s+8MQk+eybQa32n0a+s
Y4xpxwNfTBKJ0XfmrijIJYuT+Tm5DiiBa8SbjijE+rilylU5Yvb/AaSf4ji4z38F
69CkJzqStOrTnyWUkKQas28i6tZnaADLoo8tn9N8ZBXunOkeGqUC1Y=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
bh=oWHM1UM63ShCw0daY01njPcRgnk=; b=rSKHvBaMN8AsICZbiMkWuznALl9Q
HDj0eVBov75BnsT1jurg9GD7UjQ5CyDrgUmuyyuZTrl5zIV0jM9BdNysIN/KXigh
CcBqMIeVtUePhZXlcwzJKgwteYB9DBuuz6fbS7Khdc806aaXcNGw2i0TIsNZL/DF
oWc79T5pvLxzyHY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-96.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=slim, accident, highly
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:40:13 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: "Canham, Timothy K (348C)" <timothy DOT k DOT canham AT jpl DOT nasa DOT gov>
Subject: Re: pthread_attr_init() returning errors
Message-ID: <20160420144013.GC25668@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, "Canham, Timothy K (348C)" <timothy DOT k DOT canham AT jpl DOT nasa DOT gov>
References: <E8EB3633A6A4594CA063A3FCBC82C18C3621F0F6 AT ap-embx-sp40 DOT RES DOT AD DOT JPL> <20160420105016 DOT GB26118 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <E8EB3633A6A4594CA063A3FCBC82C18C3621FDE3 AT ap-embx-sp40 DOT RES DOT AD DOT JPL>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E8EB3633A6A4594CA063A3FCBC82C18C3621FDE3@ap-embx-sp40.RES.AD.JPL>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

--ALfTUftag+2gvp1h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 20 14:20, Canham, Timothy K (348C) wrote:
>> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com]=20
>> On Apr 19 19:49, Canham, Timothy K (348C) wrote:
>> > I have some code to start a task that suddenly started failing. This=
=20
>> > is pretty mature code. Here is the code fragment with my added=20
>> > printf()
>> >=20
>> >         pthread_attr_t att;
>> >         int stat =3D pthread_attr_init(&att);
>> >         if (stat !=3D 0) {
>> >             printf("pthread_attr_init: (%d)(%d): %s\n",stat,errno,stre=
rror(stat));
>> >             // return
>> >         }
>> >=20
>> > Here is the output:
>> >=20
>> > pthread_attr_init: (16)(0): Device or resource busy
>>=20
>> This is most unusual.  What happens is this:
>>=20
>> A pthread_attr_t is a pointer to a pointer to a struct with a magic
>> number.  And at the start of pthread_attr_init this magic number is
>> tested if it's already the magic number expected for an object of
>> type pthread_attr_t.  And only if so, the pthread_attr_init function
>> fails with EBUSY.
>>=20
>> That means, the arbitrary value in the uninitialized att prior to the
>> call to pthread_attr_init is a pointer value which points to valid
>> memory which has the magic value 0xdf0df048.  Wow.
>>=20
>> This means we can't keep up with the tests in the pthread_FOO_init
>> functions since they could point to an *supposedly* initialized
>> object, while in fact the value they point to is only accidentally so
>> that it looks like an initialized object.
>>=20
>> I provided new developer snapshots on https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>> and I've just uploaded a 2.5.1-0.1 test release which you can install
>> via setup as soon as your mirror has catched up.
>>=20
>> Pleaser give any of them a try.
>
> So what you are saying is that when pthread_attr_init() checked for
> the magic number in supposedly uninitialized memory it found the exact
> value of the magic number? That seems highly suspect. Seems like it
> may be pointing to a valid previous entry.

That may be the case.  But in your example, pthread_attr_t att is very
certainly uninitialized, being an uninitialized auto variable.  So, if
it actually points to an already initialized pthread_addr_t, it does so
by accident, because the stack slot it was previously used by another,
initialized pthread_addr_t.  Therefore the check in pthread_attr_init is
spurious.  Apparently there's a chance, albeit slim, that it returns
EBUSY due to a false positive.

POSIX says:

  Results are undefined if pthread_attr_init() is called specifying an
  already initialized attr attributes object.

And neither is EBUSY defined as a valid return value, nor are such
checks performed in glibc.  So I dropped the checks now in Cygwin
as well.

So, please give a dev snapshot or the 2.5.1-0.1 test release a try.


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--ALfTUftag+2gvp1h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=JQ0Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ALfTUftag+2gvp1h--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019