X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=RjSllj4ZV9gR14UP8w
	UGWWPLDdBxxTNVCI8VjGJlVVV99q6ZtSatTCzGDmSvPg54sJtvQukiznDYeJCm61
	qqH1QUBuKEksqnbqKS5ybgedfzaw/N1fVOAMx/I57NGConxVWz0TAQ2PDVhHbA23
	XtzAS0eE15z6OE/T7CfW3fyS4=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:mime-version; s=default; bh=yBXJ0N5WM5DOcRYqYiRjjU6I
	Neo=; b=xKSgjQs6gzKpZG0Lgw1k/c1Cb4PNh+fh34MW9YYtDYKPOa0FtoJOWvOk
	s9+aCI23AJ04lw9+84zYf1T3O9BczybPnHWd9l4SVKF5rTk9o0myl/rU3NcDDWvx
	Mt9vabSA6GJICDQJ9x8Y0z6eXb4n/udWtyMD1UezfSj6jkHCHZY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HCc:U*cygwin, Hx-languages-length:899, H*i:sk:57027D5, H*f:sk:57027D5
X-HELO:	mailout.ish.de
X-Abuse-ID:	hremUFXL0y-8240 AT umkbw DOT customer
From:	Helmut Karlowski <helmut DOT karlowski AT ish DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: How to install a custom permanent postinstall handler?
In-Reply-To:	<57027D59.5080509@redhat.com>
References:	<57020525 DOT 90909 AT cygwin DOT com> <57027D59 DOT 5080509 AT redhat DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:37:35 +0200
Message-Id:	<20160404173735.AC1CCA00.helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Outgoingd:	0.4.0_m1
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u34Fc1oa004602

---------------------------------------------------
> On 04/04/2016 12:09 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > On 2016-04-03 18:05, Andrey Repin wrote:
> >> Because, within my reach, Cygwin is the only system that not using
> >> DASH as
> >> /bin/sh. Though, I may try rolling some busybox…
> > 
> > There *is* a world outside of Debian/Ubuntu; Fedora, RHEL/CentOS, and
> > Arch Linux all use bash for /bin/sh.  However, a simple test in the form
> > of building GCC with dash as /bin/sh, while noticeably faster, showed
> > that Debian/Ubuntu have yet to fully upstream their work
> > ("gcc/genmultilib: 261: shift: can't shift that many").
> 
> And non-Linux systems use a completely different shell for /bin/sh
> (neither dash nor bash; BSD systems tend to use mksh).

OpenBSD uses the old pdksh with patches for /bin/sh and /bin/ksh.

-Helmut



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -