X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=UXFNgtiNHqoEOnsU
	yiN2HgcmtZSl3ukYjih2n4PlUJJiJXL3stHvOb51Oi1Ok27PtK1ltsVwxUK4MkXe
	5EivDu3VnI8Pw63yAjL8ECbOgcS0EatS7f97sYPQEHLY5xsRlcuK0B9u+G0lTIV/
	zV7uVa2cr4AA93Up+RSGiRd6F9c=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=dXzn4CDAJeWLwpkHyhIBZr
	771UI=; b=L44ndLPnqgkvWLTSLDKHLQUW48Sz+gs5Gk4OQjobQTcf7GKG3XLtPS
	UcC++97VvsJeE/82ncTARCN1PQQbK8Cuwk8YR7v0/yewpkbmK4G6dwbAg0BRTYND
	yKbQIrEMOCIy4pd51Y5ipTc94tI+J0Q7bCyHa/Buh8NppFJjnv9UM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=stack-allocated, stackallocated, Might, H*RU:!192.168.1.100!
X-HELO:	m0.truegem.net
Subject:	Re: crash caused by stack-allocated array in child process after fork?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<57016B18 DOT 6030906 AT towo DOT net>
From:	Mark Geisert <mark AT maxrnd DOT com>
Message-ID:	<57019C31.8060006@maxrnd.com>
Date:	Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:41:53 -0700
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<57016B18.6030906@towo.net>

Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Might it be related to
> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2016-03/msg00000.html ?

I can only comment on this last sentence.  Although I was seeing a particular 
function declared as a constructor being run twice, I was confused about the 
timing (due to not properly flushing log messages).  With proper logging, I saw 
that both constructor runs were in the parent process and had nothing to do with 
that parent later forking.

..mark

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -