X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=nh7XpTSgNYDIcLsu
	g+yDko5hz1w/uZmOKXfCdz/P3VuwnvN9yJ74Pj2LGNFaSVX8I4kv23Lks2vdcKfD
	nGxHBG1dCwQO1qZZrnzTi6SzXYgg1ZAT/7KVLAobSRoPpo9eiB3r+5oXhpJADwy5
	dxKVCPWWHDNFpERU4moIzvmb5eE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=kuO74cnaMoxIDzGAPOVM2G
	UBSjk=; b=ZcFxsiNLpn3YpQwc9fNdlPR4odUVQ20Q28UD3BdSgcVO9Mas3I3y5g
	2m2qPfezoPlfzfj+ECbLdKBWz80wCmDKRpgxFnU9So/zlDrgh7rWqf5IcCvm4UtT
	KF4vQqcuRotZsw0F5rUw7j/c3sfECU0O7Ac3TT3fv4cxuDp7TGn9I=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=begins, 17032016, 17.03.2016, H*r:sk:mailout
X-HELO:	mailout07.t-online.de
Subject:	Re: clang copy of limits.h misses NAME_MAX
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<56EAAD1B DOT 4030107 AT t-online DOT de> <CAFo71_5=CPzstQq8Vd3sDa6yGVDArp9oE2p1eeu-hqQbt95+nA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <56EAB2A8 DOT 4010400 AT gmail DOT com> <CAFo71_4e7+aUBduQHYYrrh-FipwJBq7eHkuK57OLDzP9Em1WRA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	=?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= <HBBroeker AT t-online DOT de>
Message-ID:	<56EAB8E7.9030507@t-online.de>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:02:15 +0100
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAFo71_4e7+aUBduQHYYrrh-FipwJBq7eHkuK57OLDzP9Em1WRA@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Am 17.03.2016 um 14:42 schrieb Ismail Donmez:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>> it seems to prefer gcc headers
>>
>> # 1 "/usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.7.1/include/limits.h" 1 3 4
>> # 37 "/usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.7.1/include/limits.h" 3 4
>> # 1 "/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/5.3.0/include/limits.h" 1 3 4
>> # 38 "/usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.7.1/include/limits.h" 2 3 4
>> # 17 "/usr/include/sys/dirent.h" 2 3 4
>
> I am looking at clang 3.7 headers on Linux so this might be not 100%
> same on Cygwin but, clang's limits.h has this on top:
>
> /* The system's limits.h may, in turn, try to #include_next GCC's limits.h.
>    Avert this #include_next madness. */
>   #if defined __GNUC__ && !defined _GCC_LIMITS_H_
>    #define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
> #endif
>
> which should prevent including gcc's own limits.h but looks like it doesn't.

Actually, that would only try to prevent expanding the contents of GCC's 
limits.h, by pre-setting its multiple-inclusion guard macro.  Which 
means that the

	#include_next<limits.h>

following it now begins to look at GCC's version, bounces off the guard 
macro, and finishes.  The actual system <limits.h> would have been 
#include_next'ed in turn (line 168 of /usr/lib/gcc/.../limits.h), but 
that was disabled by the above hack.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -