X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=UJeLdl8CtoT8EDvN
	GdKLcr3iZELXKkXiECVnEOenrCBizO7eZkyVjoZfxu4w7m+5hU5qzPoy7v6BqQaK
	tbtC54gvWeCTha51I2YpLSNv6idc9gb6slRgja2IIMLY4/7u11nWBQuq35e7sH9d
	XhA5yLqis6r3IsVYrdima3Mwtl0=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=irp4wAIq3BX521coo+AdN7
	7Ethk=; b=J8rZ/oSxt13JjJpJVRi2n6LpGd6uPkUojW2WaYB+BzzY+QvrSlUfkR
	47TRmDdSfJGSJoOVA9mQqAsXFBtiFGDRIPKSnu5jSrgEhYlR5s8VKb+Vi0wpQxPQ
	uHrfcnO7IIdrveFXurthOTa9Sc7OXtlD++i8D0iB55l9EGAnQmp5A=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=wyml AT etr-usa DOT com, wymletrusacom, sk:ler762, ler762 AT gmail DOT com
X-HELO:	mail-wm0-f44.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ds3Cv1aXGu4JGU+pQmgQls4ifxcJ0AZrHx9h8YGOLoc=; b=aSnCgaVmOnxmUgVAzoiGDQcx6MKSgzoaj5Vj1TE7glUYAQmwosZ5c1Xn9IiCyE55fa g9+TXWhlcpTrhW+UA2msXhaqMEi5MPl48yRnRQWqNMPXsdMzXgYHRPjnsNTdCQ4MM6Ex coA7FQ8cMJRLUreiQuvSfUDRTtx5ycOFTb/B7cj7rI+w2ahmkkvQ/qpaW5U2+Ty7AO0n Z+w/Rvc/UcoYRZ5qv1UESQvaVFwMGeBJfP1Kr3P7Z0pYFJ7kUZBC4l22Gxnl3lt6KNhq JWslJ/Ph57on/QjjB9TCJIF9edhOknQ8lOjxfpUmQ5vRQ/wgiySv4vg4eI/Bmlkv2Sv+ yzFA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AD7BkJJxGFhvB0zV7Fxur/oCjqyzcc9O13uddpJ1BjIZj6vdUA011Srcsl+YiM0WhUyEZArUeu+Xr9pvlTKfLA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.28.212.85 with SMTP id l82mr5989273wmg.82.1458150747950; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<8D39BB0F-A716-4F56-AF2D-D6C928266F5A@etr-usa.com>
References:	<56E6F25A DOT 7070000 AT gmx DOT de> <56E75B3E DOT 7020102 AT farance DOT com> <CAD8GWstL-rUm9=q8tpReiiHm8Tmm94Caq7jQyszZ02Tw=EN_TQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <8D39BB0F-A716-4F56-AF2D-D6C928266F5A AT etr-usa DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:52:27 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAD8GWssCEcFQmrqso0UXgDuA07vuTK-4ZfVvbrMsRDFzapXivw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: ctrl-c doesn't reliably kill ping
From:	Lee <ler762 AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u2GHqsU3029549

On 3/16/16, Warren Young <wyml AT etr-usa DOT com> wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 10:07 AM, Lee <ler762 AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> The last time I tried the cygwin ping program it didn't return a
>> failure status
>
> It does if you don’t Ctrl-C out of it.  So, if you’re using it from a
> script, you just ask for one packet:
>
>     # ping does.not.exist 1 1
>     ping: unknown host does.not.exist
>     # echo $?
>     1

Thanks for the info - nice to know that the cygwin version of ping is
getting better.
Not that it's going to make any difference to me & my scripts, but

$ which ping
/cygdrive/c/windows/system32/ping

$ ping www.examle.com

Pinging www.examle.com [69.172.201.208] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
<crtl>C

$ echo $?
130

> Note my fine new # prompt, indicating an admin shell, which has been
> required for Cygwin ping from the very beginning[1] due to the restrictions
> on raw sockets added in Windows XP SP2.

I've had a windows admin account for doing admin type things and a
user account with no special/extra privs for normal use ever since I
started using Win-XP, so the requirement to be running as admin (or
answer a UAC prompt) puts cygwin ping into the "does not meet my
needs" category.

>  Windows ping gets around this by
> special dispensation of the kernel.[2]
>
> If you want to say Cygwin ping is “useless” because of that,

My apologies.  If I offended you or anyone else it wasn't intentional.
I should have done a better job with my wording :(

Best Regards,
Lee

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -