X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:to:subject:date:in-reply-to
	:references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
	q=dns; s=default; b=fnufb/zZA/SIpsR0pfiFwXd1YDf/NTgXAOgxBcUaT+y
	O5miOmJC699mH94OeZfFPW7CzCBhQbvYDZS6Ay7ObGnJBlO11dSsmjmiS2PPxhnd
	9nbdQOsQUtGv0RkpddsFPu4FsyJLa+ApT1ZmJbpZgs8+bl6qxfZ0RTjEtO26v6MM
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:to:subject:date:in-reply-to
	:references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
	s=default; bh=PjU86IoqPGIvvyr4Y8BPlVkTG9Y=; b=wFNb2ZckYIGgsIv0R
	f5YU3xPVy4ASp3/29F1Zg9M/k8L3QbCerz/b2+SfXIzlX/IsRkxpFdrSVBc7qL8/
	Chab7bi26hfiyPRW2FpNXqPtvmYlUjgV1Nr2+Asjynbvub4t4llZ8qXPjUp0UKcl
	M2TeYlKuIV5zl7Hx9HeXXg6qVI=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_60,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:7.5.7601.23008, mingw64-*-winpthreads-4.0.5-1, mingw64-*-runtime-4.0.5-1, mingw64*headers4051
X-HELO:	BAY004-OMC1S11.hotmail.com
X-TMN:	[rrUzkEGK8n1rAVLrRPodZNULLeFQ5zrW]
Message-ID:	<BAY169-W74EC22425C0B369EA3DC5AA7B30@phx.gbl>
From:	Tony Kelman <tony AT kelman DOT net>
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1 (x86/x86_64)
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 23:31:38 -0800
In-Reply-To:	<announce.56DEA4BE.30005@gmail.com>
References:	<announce DOT 56DEA4BE DOT 30005 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u297VqYW025235

> I have just updated the mingw-w64 headers, runtime, and winpthreads to
> 4.0.5-1.
>
> mingw64-*-headers-4.0.5-1
> mingw64-*-runtime-4.0.5-1
> mingw64-*-winpthreads-4.0.5-1

Question, since I just had issues building some of LLVM's unit tests and
tracked the root cause back to here - is it intentional that x86_64-headers
gets built with --enable-secure-api but i686-headers doesn't?

Thanks,
Tony

 		 	   		  
--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -