X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=C452g/2abq18ClMCW8mt
	s7MGSxEgbwPWGL3EH/sumg/DhY9t0GXioUM0QY1QZOmCREvI5HDSzJG3CMemY1Nh
	mqy5dM3Is2BWrXhbrwNAssFmw/PeCuvKsYVSMRF4kIDcdvcTgMF5xkH9UEkI5edi
	/Ya+8rvqOHru304zOAs1CUY=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:message-id; s=default; bh=M2Fq1DJ0ta3R4CxMLAtT2bfYR5
	I=; b=q89x2jXBmibjrP+rai551NQhFC7HALzXKGZl5IWh55xYReTGvziV4daRWy
	cZbmB3dm+AKNwUuoTajI84l+olYt2MSYp/fy1P0j5j+ndek/Fdepp1BTGaDDoZGK
	yVJRoBct0DdFRGFdlsTlzz9HSFaUR2zWfcEUxmZpmlA6Ju4c4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Pipes, H*UA:Webmail
X-HELO:	lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Sun, 03 Jan 2016 23:47:06 +0100
From:	Houder <houder AT xs4all DOT nl>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Pipes Again. (was: cmp (or echo) bug?) -- more correction
In-Reply-To:	<a33618ac83154dae265bb9906dd966e0@xs4all.nl>
References:	<a33618ac83154dae265bb9906dd966e0 AT xs4all DOT nl>
Message-ID:	<6e92b2c8a1a07d61a6d6832d289b1087@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender:	houder AT xs4all DOT nl (LdBx7EG55K7/dXlKZZX+lw==)
User-Agent:	XS4ALL Webmail
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2016-01-02 12:58, Houder wrote:

> Cygwin shows:
> @@ ./t_stat <(echo foo) <(echo bar)
> ... arg = /dev/fd/63
> File type:                FIFO or pipe
> Device containing i-node: (c6)   major=0   minor=198
> I-node number:            0 - decimal: 0
> ... arg = /dev/fd/62
> File type:                FIFO or pipe
> Device containing i-node: (c6)   major=0   minor=198
> I-node number:            0 - decimal: 0
> fd[0] = 3, fd[1] = 3
> 
> And sometimes, especially in case close(fd[f]) is NOT present ...
> 
> @@ ./t_stat <(echo foo) <(echo bar)
> ... arg = /dev/fd/63
> File type:                FIFO or pipe
> Device containing i-node: (c6)   major=0   minor=198
> I-node number:            0 - decimal: 0
> ... arg = /dev/fd/62
> File type:                FIFO or pipe
> Device containing i-node: (c6)   major=0   minor=198
> I-node number:            5c443bd7b7e540 - decimal: 25970721670292800
> fd[0] = 3, fd[1] = 4
> 
>  - Cygwin shows 198 for st_dev in case fstat() is used
>  - Cygwin shows 199 for st_dev in case stat() is used
>  - Cygwin shows 197 for st_dev in case fstat() is used and in case the 
> command
>    reads as follows:
> @@ ./t_stat >(cat > a) >(cat > b) # yes, the opposite case - had to try
> 
>  - Cygwin nearly always shows ZERO for both st_ino-s (same call); 
> however, if
>    one of the st_ino-s is NOT zero, Cygwin always shows the same value:
> I-node number:            5c443bd7b7e540 - decimal: 25970721670292800

Should be read:

  - Cygwin nearly always shows ZERO ... etc., etc. in case of fstat() 
!!!!!
  - Cygwin always shows different values for both st_ino-s (same call) in 
case of
    stat(); values that are different from the ones in subsequent calls

Sorry,
Henri

> Bottom-line:
> 
>  - instrumenting cmp with the same "diagnostics", yields the same 
> result
>  - cmp fails on Cygwin, because Cygwin returns both st_ino-s as equal 
> (zero).
> 
> My reason for posting this, is to help others in case they stumble over 
> this
> weird behaviour of Cygwin.

=====

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -