X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=iROi8DPYr6NjEWXM
	2rzWWxbk+1U1uwkTrsN4b6r8rRxLKeaYDM7/7GuJtB3fS0/jLWlsI4WewOn3eKcn
	gAR45rjLbTu+YDfNGcCrHUd4lMZBq28ryjEGjk7vJidZKMC29WDodtx35yx3nnIU
	uVBd/nr0qo9eey/0jA6B7o9GCHo=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=EqqgtOhUouhDKnlWXUcwmb
	FvNtw=; b=rFWOoBkasmcUVNEPIogZ90sGLEKt5DMnXZZDodIFk1BbyVcffcoR/c
	aepiJp9Qnt9FK+1Z5D4CdkHRd7TqjWK1NRdo5sqhQUGPdJe1PfOnrMxiYDqweCPX
	ONXP+Ci/JPjTeiczT7r/28ZUwoVUYoY4FCJF9CBXkkNGWsLHl44VU=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=qrasmfu8f4snkmailcom, qrasmfu8f4 AT snkmail DOT com, bike, H*i:sk:567BAC5
X-HELO:	mail-io0-f176.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.107.62.136 with SMTP id l130mr23178141ioa.28.1450980667575; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Subject:	Re: rxvt for cygwin64?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<26785-1450944756-673263 AT sneakemail DOT com> <567BAC5E DOT 5040100 AT gmail DOT com>
From:	cyg Simple <cygsimple AT gmail DOT com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status:	N1110
Message-ID:	<567C354E.2090800@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:11:26 -0500
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<567BAC5E.5040100@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 12/24/2015 3:27 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> 
> 
> On 24/12/2015 09:12, qrasmfu8f4 AT snkmail DOT com wrote:
>> I've been using cygwin's rxvt (without X) for years, and prefer it to
>> mintty both because I use rxvt on all my linux machines and because
>> I've never liked putty.  Despite most (but not all) of my Windows
>> machines running 64-but windows7, I've procrastinated on switching to
>> cygwin64, but I recently had to replace my laptop with a new Windows
>> 10 machine, and figured I might as well install cygwin64.  Everything
>> went well until I discovered rxvt is not available in 64-bit.  I found
>> this thread (https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-09/msg00016.html) from
>> 9/2013 in the archives, but there doesn't seem to have been any
>> resolution.
>>
>> Is there any plan to port rxvt to cygwin64?
> 
> no plan.
> rxvt is dead upstream, and rxvt without X is a hell and without
> a maintainer by long time
> 

Uhm not really a hell but is troublesome.  You need to build the windows
X emulation pieces first.  The fact that upstream maintenance is dead
will be a bigger issue.  There may need to be items you need to deal
with at the 64bit level.

> mintty is a much better solution and with an active maintainer
> 

Your opinion on the bike shed color but the fact that there is active
development is a plus.

-- 
cyg Simple

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -