X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=nHCy3INMIM0pRgvMm8PSEyWxa5DqULBy0o9FWafq0En
	0IYiMpSyvQHd5/WJQGmDHXPHsr0eoa3OuFwZmQOin7VXlv6P/blgqXM54L5aCSy7
	j/jTYhCkeh/iY0Ad3Yt2pXrdxy5e/b1aJ23Sw1PNJT/uCz10VshZoVKkx5R71l2s
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=HlKfuI1Ddw+QiN+FQKAuFI0hB/k=; b=wMcDmDoYShV/a3Kpv
	2MqFW6O2LpVQvMDPrwx7/6tq3AkdMNAkrGMdJS6DmaC7Lf+dhTbH7YaAMsOBVLMJ
	ggpyEOzmc7pzXmRnk/gmZWg4uRCu2seZBSiOnPHZsjL1ZV+IIV+8qNW8TjMzkHSl
	3hzWF82WlNydFZNglyel4WFpSU=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Emacs, badly
X-HELO:	mail-in-17.arcor-online.net
X-DKIM:	Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-05.arcor-online.net 3pMYST5xR1z2xqp
From:	Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin multithreading performance
References:	<CABPLASTtRK4mNxh0M_AnZgjJQ15kWPx+L=U=VCU3Wwi7jV_57A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:06:45 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<CABPLASTtRK4mNxh0M_AnZgjJQ15kWPx+L=U=VCU3Wwi7jV_57A@mail.gmail.com> (Kacper Michajlow's message of "Sat, 14 Nov 2015 01:24:18 +0100")
Message-ID:	<87bn9nhk3e.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id tBIF77ee030710

Kacper Michajlow writes:
> I recently noticed that Cygwin multithreading is very inefficient. I
> was repacking few git repositories and with Cygwin's git, it spawns
> threads but they are so badly synchronized that there is no speed gain
> over one thread and possible loose because of the overhead. On my
> machine I got 7-10% CPU usage while with git build with mingw easily
> uses 100%.

I've been testing this again with my local copy of Emacs' Git repository
and at least on this two-core system it works just fine (it was working
fine on a four-core system earlier).  The object count phase looks
serialized and doesn't go over 50%, however a good deal of that is
system time anyway, so I assume it's file access.  The actual
compression uses whatever CPU it can get, with the occasional spike in
system time when it goes to disk (it's an SSD).

Is your repo local or on some remote filesystem?


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptation for Waldorf microQ V2.22R2:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -