delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2015/11/19/15:50:49

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=cLS8YEVSOl0P+DvX
4ywkwrxnSYLmPPO5UO5schCC4Ons+H3ZTjyurq6mPVlYw4gMBNJanLaajm7PjxT3
TswZ5DRpSDlsKbhoi3gaAaZ80Yt1+rrDm3zDKGO/gEBhNVNRrYtUkYCCwpwhaMxV
2fU8T0y8vTs63eA8nHECymIc5fg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=QZGpUeXzll+i0SdnJuaF86
/wXpo=; b=J51g+bJ4RPEZuXui/V/RkiGEKNdKk5Q6VFS5IuTvB9hyZygFQoWiM8
ZfvVIaEUkGwBvlI0RZYp2DbPcl75LrAZr/pRykh5STzrUFk/rX6/pT2bF0aSuHcf
qalddSAZafu+tC7j9ZihfZ7cjyx/Yn6IXNJgCRc/1MUwZCzTmFHtA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtp.ht-systems.ru
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:43:41 +0300
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <410217394.20151119234341@yandex.ru>
To: Andrew Schulman <schulman DOT andrew AT epa DOT gov>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: does anyone care about package minor version bump announcements?
In-Reply-To: <tmor4bp8h0osb27rn2sn4mviph91391247@4ax.com>
References: <tmor4bp8h0osb27rn2sn4mviph91391247 AT 4ax DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Greetings, Andrew Schulman!

> Lately I find myself feeling quite unmotivated about writing a mostly
> boilerplate announcement every time I upload a minor version bump of a
> package I maintain.

Then automate the announces! Let stupid hardware do stupid work.
It was designed to do exactly that!

> "stow has been updated from version 2.2.0 to 2.2.2.  You can read the
> upstream changelog to see what changed.  stow is blah blah blah"

> Does anyone care about that?  Lately I don't.  In fact I've skipped sending
> the last few, and no one seems to have noticed.

> Can we leave it to the maintainer's discretion about whether they need to
> send one of those on every update?  Maybe it already is, and I didn't know.
> Of course some updates are important or need explanation or a headsup, and
> then the maintainer should send one.

IMHO, the announcements are useful to track version history.
Unless there's some other comparable source, they are useful for archival
purposes.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Thursday, November 19, 2015 23:41:24

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019