X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=PZ1ydsRcYXVCqtSquv4VBIkYGL9QfxLqXgeMH0mKHwHI+w6nNHtJD
	MMz/T08RVv5T8Zbnpj59xq5UzN01VfynuAeyfLz62EDdVsRx3JLF/XAxXyhKhGQd
	Int2FLxyI2WWuS+UQUjrxWffYkmyx2JQVchlxNHg+znilQC8nA6YX0=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=SnR5XhgYawGsKwPOwyrA3MudPb4=; b=WvWvGztW1BaAaexh7qiABXjolGBR
	Jyxf0UKAG7LncIkr7U+EpShrR6g+mVtLcOAPiwsXkQO8hsYSougycVDcGaLvOuyO
	pXt8yydMWy3BlFSWwBs/P8G/1sWlgPN8OtYyDFqIKPkpQxOiezzM/upQE49VA30J
	3TY8wDRl7lmQ0po=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:37:33 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin64 vs. Cygwin (speed)
Message-ID:	<20151103173733.GB31094@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAK-n8j5ihsWL=acJE7bUTCHZuCUcKvk-hEPTAtfg0c00tuBi=w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAK-n8j5ihsWL=acJE7bUTCHZuCUcKvk-hEPTAtfg0c00tuBi=w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--U+BazGySraz5kW0T
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov  3 07:59, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> In another thread, I wrote (and Corinna replied):
>=20
> >> I have tried 64-bit Cygwin in the past.  I do a lot of file I/O and
> >> sorting/searching on largish test-based data sets, and 64-bit was
> >> noticeably slower than 32-bit Cygwin,
> >
> > Hmm, I usually have the opposite impression...
>=20
> I'm using malloc/calloc, is there a different memory allocator I
> should be using for Cygwin64?

There is none.  While Cygwin's malloc is slow in multi-threading
scenarios due to dumb locking (which I really hope to fix at one point),
it shouldn't be any slower on 64 bit compared to 32 bit.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--U+BazGySraz5kW0T
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=XxjN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--U+BazGySraz5kW0T--

- Raw text -