delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to | |
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= | |
default; b=rvFpdge9yN+/ZMPF3Kis5BE9eaQtkdm0Ud6W+8YcXrs7lnvOE4N7Q | |
V5iEaS70T7YvvhhmyCnDfNWTWefbnXFfxPytksbQwp6JXsQOnPotdIGCvC8XzsEH | |
487OjJ98uyBcB9bN6EoE2UaZiAUT5acaCgepzZ/DCZbtAEklRrRD2w= | |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to | |
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; | |
bh=7fVP2zkLMuwJ0lui5EJok2jsTWk=; b=mdqSoZ4rle0f3pPlWLaHLgpsD2qG | |
wxc6K1LJc1p0eY/cT7YtmtQGxDC+vTZrz0eMIKGGA065gMlaFfK1Ym3C0/wOHz7m | |
w1I83r9UU9jB80mpjgCFdftNnsRc2FfzcV2FtiSPWxb2XRxmYxmGA0EMXpwxBmx9 | |
h+Rogk28yDvPEF4= | |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; auth=none |
X-Virus-Found: | No |
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 |
X-HELO: | calimero.vinschen.de |
Date: | Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:18:38 +0100 |
From: | Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: pthread_kill: signals remain pending after target thread exits |
Message-ID: | <20151102141838.GB963@calimero.vinschen.de> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <28F5B565B6F6424C87E4AC0DCC84316575D71070 AT S1P5DAG5C DOT EXCHPROD DOT USA DOT NET> <20151021114810 DOT GQ5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <28F5B565B6F6424C87E4AC0DCC84316575D73A86 AT S1P5DAG5C DOT EXCHPROD DOT USA DOT NET> <20151023125540 DOT GI5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <28F5B565B6F6424C87E4AC0DCC84316575D8071E AT S1P5DAG5C DOT EXCHPROD DOT USA DOT NET> <20151028091459 DOT GZ5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20151029080218 DOT GF5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <28F5B565B6F6424C87E4AC0DCC84316575D81A49 AT S1P5DAG5C DOT EXCHPROD DOT USA DOT NET> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <28F5B565B6F6424C87E4AC0DCC84316575D81A49@S1P5DAG5C.EXCHPROD.USA.NET> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
--V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Oct 29 16:16, John Carey wrote: > > From: Corinna Vinschen [corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 1:02 AM > > On Oct 28 10:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > ... > > > > Thanks; that was fast! I tried replacing cygwin1.dll with cygwin1-= 20151023.dll . > > > > > > > > The original test case now works. I checked some of my other tests, > > > > and unfortunately some of them failed, so I extracted out a new test > > > > case, which is attached. My guess is that something is subtly diff= erent > > > > about the timing on this test. > > > > > > Is this a regression? Did it work with 2.2.1? > >=20 > > Answering myself here, this didn't work at all in 2.2.1. I can > > reproduce the problem and I'm going to take a look. Not sure if > > there's a quick solution, though. This looks like a deadlock > > situation. The signal definitely got send, I just don't see yet > > why it's not handled in wait_sig. >=20 > Yes, test_pending_signal2.c fails in 2.2.1, though the symptoms > differ: there is no Cygwin process left hanging that cannot be > killed by a Cygwin signal. >=20 > But both tests appear to pass in Cygwin 1.7.9, so in that sense > it is a regression, just not a recent one. The regression here was my original fix. It didn't clear pending signals for an exiting thread thorougly enough. I applied a patch now which should fix this issue. I'll upload a new developer snapshot to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ later today or tomorrow (still looking into the PrlFS issue). Please give it a try. Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIbBAEBCAAGBQJWN3C+AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gbfIP9jLtYwSKtmkTBPIH/KQ38Sxe wIRpnMNXjjcPm4eQy9b201Kl5LnLp2IhsTxuasm2sslzJzy00K0mNk1o408ur6ET rTPUhnY3346YnGu767NIOGpHnYYtMuoiCrEvXFm69LtGSykqilcDO3umCqMpvH1D VOP2QY3+CqTIgiOLmxUuptC/prfYzLwGoBGc/sgIgvDLc/+WfDW4U7hftVXQAn4G tWLSobE94ccFvzBlTG7vNc+RepcS+MX68XUF656cRbJAfdeJJOuUpwIoXbBkecXV p7Iyni01Y4V9mlZWhQeQ+meV4l5JDjrsS6jOqkWekBJsXWDjDZnASyTKE7X0VSfC MTxSaNsf9hmKH+p/UWXC9jOC7F3HXMHAzohfYh1DVzceHwYRD9bPV/NEnTXlzejt JdtQCEa3NxojRVCptqY8qHwuBXf7nCJlERQoIKGsBhyRvZBaBs6pYJSVMsklPTWq K4gKt2GSo7zS12+DTloKn/C9i2JGGx5Pn/FfkZc7MTvBER44j7o2vC7/M1WKIKtG j2iRPQ4+biisOm2Ul8jN4qTe+ROqlcNbflpS3lZ3ZjQvdgw27I5UPdKXsBzyE+uk jgFVC858I4WH9Jx9nsqEGN5ztf8jbSot3G6O+3efUclvett+L3YDx5c9yDjho06p 48IQtTa0LCb/Pin+UX0= =G0mW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |