X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=A8BMx9iEoZrAW1M2X7193/57oyAfv
	Xef+WB1QkISaLHv24SUXBqjP7UV8jSCFT3SpJ1qwrvUDWS5BQfEkFc3JPe56smXj
	OU59NNGLzgvwwab7wPD0UbM8JouVbDD6Exe35HxfsHZi4wcL5EN56aD+5yv/U24Y
	PW7VFF9Gnc3wUk=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; s=default; bh=FCuDRO0ruGZNza+pWrTIUtcqZik=; b=eH0
	a6fgQY0TAzuXA71YGLfV7XC9qzP4/UDUXNRqRFI+pE1G6/JrOV9SBvWrOq2qI6pU
	DwPW7/fRcEIjhPlJlcdv0rrcpC50ftRvuiMVbhnzc1rSyKvxwHFxKMAcDGGE7p2y
	zXhwlDJc9D7CRVJrZQ3/LL9AESnDNjSZxQP3jUxI=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-User:	qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO:	gwo2.mbox.net
X-USANET-Received:	from gwo2.mbox.net [127.0.0.1] by gwo2.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.4.02J) with ESMTP id 521TJCqq76032Mo2; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:16:58 -0000
X-USANET-Routed:	5 gwsout-gwsd Q:gwsd
X-USANET-Routed:	3 gwsout-vs Q:bmvirus
X-USANET-GWS2-Tenant:	electric-cloud.com
X-USANET-GWS2-Tagid:	ECLD
X-USANET-Source:	165.212.120.254 OUT aeolus AT electric-cloud DOT com S1P5HUB5.EXCHPROD.USA.NET TLS
X-USANET-MsgId:	XID658TJCqq81341Xo2
From:	John Carey <aeolus AT electric-cloud DOT com>
To:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>,
	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: pthread_kill: signals remain pending after target thread exits
Date:	Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:16:50 +0000
Message-ID:	<28F5B565B6F6424C87E4AC0DCC84316575D81A49@S1P5DAG5C.EXCHPROD.USA.NET>
References:	<28F5B565B6F6424C87E4AC0DCC84316575D71070 AT S1P5DAG5C DOT EXCHPROD DOT USA DOT NET> <20151021114810 DOT GQ5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <28F5B565B6F6424C87E4AC0DCC84316575D73A86 AT S1P5DAG5C DOT EXCHPROD DOT USA DOT NET> <20151023125540 DOT GI5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <28F5B565B6F6424C87E4AC0DCC84316575D8071E AT S1P5DAG5C DOT EXCHPROD DOT USA DOT NET> <20151028091459 DOT GZ5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>,<20151029080218 DOT GF5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20151029080218.GF5319@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t9TGHuxK026145

> From: Corinna Vinschen [corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 1:02 AM
> On Oct 28 10:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
...
> > > Thanks; that was fast!  I tried replacing cygwin1.dll with cygwin1-20151023.dll .
> > >
> > > The original test case now works.  I checked some of my other tests,
> > > and unfortunately some of them failed, so I extracted out a new test
> > > case, which is attached.  My guess is that something is subtly different
> > > about the timing on this test.
> >
> > Is this a regression?  Did it work with 2.2.1?
> 
> Answering myself here, this didn't work at all in 2.2.1.  I can
> reproduce the problem and I'm going to take a look.  Not sure if
> there's a quick solution, though.  This looks like a deadlock
> situation.  The signal definitely got send, I just don't see yet
> why it's not handled in wait_sig.

Yes, test_pending_signal2.c fails in 2.2.1, though the symptoms
differ: there is no Cygwin process left hanging that cannot be
killed by a Cygwin signal.

But both tests appear to pass in Cygwin 1.7.9, so in that sense
it is a regression, just not a recent one.

-- John Carey

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -