delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to | |
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= | |
default; b=MLdtcs4w3JASWsEWGAZ11Q6BusDOXtvl3rKg1I05Cj9gIJ/abZ/i8 | |
uxma4n8GnhvxIyW7S+OKlzZJzF1HWFaZW4B7v7XXmnUADrlWVldKs0arsUxRzwT4 | |
v/7YASrSxoXPD9ZW9CTwqBbq9TIbSz/9mIAspr0TVhF2nehRgsPyeY= | |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to | |
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; | |
bh=+jReaw/CHCz+G1Wsd9gfZ2OoQbA=; b=XtpSlLvRkTMQh/Zh8+A/ThjtEQ4i | |
rB6lLe1r5W7aQxzpCtC863tFRiKppWjyMHCu4v8RtWCX9tmtTVW4r2BioX6ufEB+ | |
M1qx9F7GdLtg/g3865a4EFuu6Yw4RHJPfgLzR1382xaDCe/1fCmhRy+l4Y4VXPiA | |
ISPCCQj+1FEt2Cg= | |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; auth=none |
X-Virus-Found: | No |
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 |
X-HELO: | calimero.vinschen.de |
Date: | Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:10:28 +0100 |
From: | Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.3.0-0.4 |
Message-ID: | <20151027101028.GS5319@calimero.vinschen.de> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <announce DOT 20151022162227 DOT GC5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20151023T153449-500 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20151026100756 DOT GC31990 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <562E4ED0 DOT 7020907 AT Nexgo DOT DE> <20151027092722 DOT GN5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <n0nhja$1ji$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <n0nhja$1ji$1@ger.gmane.org> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
--Ca5z/wkVxIQXz1GF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Oct 27 10:53, Achim Gratz wrote: > Am 27.10.2015 um 10:27 schrieb Corinna Vinschen: > >>That test is almost as bad as it can ever get. Given that enumerating = all > >>AD accouts with mkpasswd takes about 2 hours and I'm doing something ve= ry > >>similar here, I'm not even surprised. I was more surprised to see the > >>server go so fast, but my guess is that it can use jumbo frames to talk= to > >>the AD. > > > >Ok, so you don't seem to think this is a major drawback. >=20 > I didn't say I would not like to see it run faster. Me neither. No wonder Windows largely skips showing effective permissions unless explicitely requested by the user. > But considering the > alternatives, working correctly all the times at the current speed seems = to > cover my more typical uses a lot better. Ok. > >No worries. I'm mulling over the idea to release 2.3.0 this week > >without the new ACL handling code to get the latest fixes out of the > >door first and push this stuff into a 2.4.0 release in November. >=20 > As long as you keep reminding us which snapshot has the new ACL handling > code, that is OK with me. I guess you should better use the latest test releases, which I'll always build with the new ACL handling. The snapshots are rather for quick&dirty testing the latest changes. > I will want to push out the snapshot in a week or > two and remove some of my workarounds for ACL corrections and/or noacl > mounted directories in order to see if these things are working now for > real. Cool. I'm looking forward to it. > >>>Given the above result, I'm wondering if we can afford using AuthZ at > >>>all. OTOH I don't see any other way to get the correct POSIX permissi= ons > >>>from a non-Cygwin ACL :( > >> > >>If you really want fast but incorrect there's always the "noacl" mount > >>option. > > > >Right. OTOH, maybe we could enhance the "acl" mount option? > > > >"acl" -> "quickacl" -> "noacl"? >=20 > Let's worry about that middle ground scenario when the ACL code has proven > itself. The danger here is that the edge cases that will make problems a= re > not easy to spot before you run into them Good point. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --Ca5z/wkVxIQXz1GF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWL02UAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+g3lMP/3R9D73pJ2B/FUvKaJSEpKVu a50ea/pGmEtIykgq/CVawyD4NnSPzTTE3IstBX226kph069+9Nh+iKPlM7H7AZf/ 9fla8MDC3mjqiU8qnQe2X7FAW7eeOgbvRNG1MrbAk6apfq5monv8s6dz1CMNiTT0 qHiBucA8sDdLrm+dnB375FFyaZqOeoUh47IieqGgcMbBv1Vu+5aOkoXxX16XaO2O m4slHrAnw/i34NrIrXXBNDF3YhuYwIKaonzk9QEHqe4r8VWd+C4eUtMYCr9XqecQ lJw14fQ3DOcAEfxZ97oyvcLsIwrHhkHsFFQEIBNq+e91khhzUWz5VfZLFcj58WLh ITf8EMbrnKdaytV5ppj96TUQU4zvMZJbe88XP/3adJ6tj0vi4epmdp8WkM4P7Yh0 2qGIKbHtx823WN4ZpJWNApgMyqtruLLbArwGx6pXcn8ZMXZCE43Xy2fIV8t5bZ44 d760mQ40OOa8WMiuP/WA6+IM0fCEbqHa3MKy+esssQgGQEzWOVSvbllmC6n7/+JB nslp5ht61bYDNrBO7Xmn76I16V8zzyBrmpE2JhEyX7H2lJbhkKFjz5wQf0epYTKb 4bHvzo+Z16uc4s2JqV3N9sqwEtDzgIdQs/vCXMS3ptlc5TJOZ5A0RPup9ohTr79a 8+2/sgjayYFqDmXeKyH7 =kqiE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ca5z/wkVxIQXz1GF--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |